These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

263 related items for PubMed ID: 16148696

  • 21. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Adunka OF, Buss E, Clark MS, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.
    Morris LG, Mallur PS, Roland JT, Waltzman SB, Lalwani AK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA, Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Labadie RF.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study.
    Henson AM, Slattery WH, Luxford WM, Mills DM.
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 9918174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Our experience with bilateral cochlear implantation].
    Carmel E, Taitelbaum-Swead R, Migirov L, Hildesheimer M, Kronenberg J.
    Harefuah; 2008 Mar; 147(3):200-3, 279. PubMed ID: 18488858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Minimal access surgery for the Symphonix/Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear hearing implant.
    Foyt D, Carfrae M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 16436985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Recent results with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant and TEMPO+ behind-the-ear processor.
    Anderson I, Weichbold V, D'Haese P.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2002 Apr; 81(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 11987740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Tone recognition and electrode discrimination in prelingually deafened cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei CG, Cao KL, Chen XW, Jin X, Zheng ZY, Zeng FG.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 15195586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS, Sillon M, Vieu A, Artieres F, Piron JP, Daures JP, Mondain M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H, Tsuji J, Kanemaru S, Fujino K, Ito J.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.