These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

96 related items for PubMed ID: 16155703

  • 41. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction.
    Hu J, Tang Z, Wang D, Buckley MJ.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Sep; 59(9):1041-5; discussion 1046. PubMed ID: 11526575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Use of a new curvilinear distractor to repair mandibular defects in dogs.
    Shang H, Lin X, Du J, He L, Liu Y.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 50(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 21470726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Experimental study of mineralization in mandibular bone distraction with irradiation during the consolidation phase.
    Girod A, Roger T, Breton P, Bouletreau P.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):386-94. PubMed ID: 16253511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Consolidation period in alveolar distraction: a pilot histomorphometric study in the mandible of the beagle dog.
    Cano J, Campo J, Gonzalo JC, Bascones A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Dec; 21(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 16796280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Effect of distraction rate and consolidation period on bone density following mandibular osteodistraction in rats.
    King GJ, Liu ZJ, Wang LL, Chiu IY, Whelan MF, Huang GJ.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 12663075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Effect of distraction rates on expression of bone morphogenetic proteins in rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Cheung LK, Zheng LW, Ma L.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 34(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 16781161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Changes in parathyroid hormone-related protein and 3-dimensional trabecular bone structure of the mandibular condyle following mandibular distraction osteogenesis in growing rats.
    Shibazaki R, Maki K, Tachikawa T, Shibasaki Y, Hinton RJ, Carlson DS, Opperman LA.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 63(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 15789323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. The effect of distraction rate on bone histological and histomorphometrical properties in an ovine mandible model.
    Dinu C, Kretschmer W, Băciuţ M, Rotaru H, Bolboacă SD, Gheban D, Muste A, Cătoi C, Peştean C, Băciuţ G.
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):819-25. PubMed ID: 21892524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. [Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-3 and tissue inhibitor metalloproteinases-1 in regenerated rabbit bone after mandibular osteodistraction].
    Zou S, Wang Z, Hu J.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):342-3, 363. PubMed ID: 14650982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Expression of TGF-beta1, osteonectin, and BMP-4 in mandibular distraction osteogenesis with compression stimulation: reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction study and biomechanical test.
    Kim UK, Park SJ, Seong WJ, Heo J, Hwang DS, Kim YD, Shin SH, Kim GC.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 68(9):2076-84. PubMed ID: 20542368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. The effect of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) on the regenerate bone in distraction osteogenesis.
    Ozkan K, Eralp L, Kocaoglu M, Ahishali B, Bilgic B, Mutlu Z, Turker M, Ozkan FU, Sahin K, Guven M.
    Growth Factors; 2007 Apr; 25(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 17891595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Evaluation of the effect of low-level diode laser therapy applied during the bone consolidation period following mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the human.
    Abd-Elaal AZ, El-Mekawii HA, Saafan AM, El Gawad LA, El-Hawary YM, Abdelrazik MA.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 44(8):989-97. PubMed ID: 25979190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Effect of Cyclic Compressive Forces on New Bone Formation during the Distraction Period in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Using a Microactuator-Generated Distractor.
    Kwon HJ, Cha JY, Park JT, Kim HJ, Kim HJ.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Oct; 146(4):783-791. PubMed ID: 32590521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular bone regenerated by bone transport distraction osteogenesis.
    Kontogiorgos E, Elsalanty ME, Zapata U, Zakhary I, Nagy WW, Dechow PC, Opperman LA.
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2011 Jul; 89(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 21556698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.