These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 16158648

  • 21. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ, Yarnell Bonino A, Buss E.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Dec; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Upward spread of masking, hearing loss, and speech recognition in young and elderly listeners.
    Klein AJ, Mills JH, Adkins WY.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1266-71. PubMed ID: 2324393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S, Kollmeier B, Brand T, Jürgens T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Exploring the sensitivity of speech-in-noise tests for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Jansen S, Luts H, Dejonckere P, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 24237040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Svec A, Dubno JR, Nelson PB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43. PubMed ID: 25786946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
    Christiansen C, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L, Zekveld A, Hällgren M, Rönnberg J.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr 24; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan 24; 107(1):538-46. PubMed ID: 10641662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
    Croghan NBH, Smith ZM.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Jan 24; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. A simulation framework for auditory discrimination experiments: Revealing the importance of across-frequency processing in speech perception.
    Schädler MR, Warzybok A, Ewert SD, Kollmeier B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May 24; 139(5):2708. PubMed ID: 27250164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML, Culling JF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov 24; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr 24; 97(4):2430-41. PubMed ID: 7714260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar 24; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.
    Qin MK, Oxenham AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul 24; 114(1):446-54. PubMed ID: 12880055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jul 24; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Aided growth of masking for speech and nonspeech signals.
    Fortune T.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Jun 24; 20(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 10386848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Speech perception and talker segregation: effects of level, pitch, and tactile support with multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Drullman R, Bronkhorst AW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov 24; 116(5):3090-8. PubMed ID: 15603154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Interactive effects of low-pass filtering and masking noise on word recognition.
    Scott T, Green WB, Stuart A.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Oct 24; 12(9):437-44. PubMed ID: 11699814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.