These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

160 related items for PubMed ID: 16158808

  • 1. Influence of different adhesive restorative materials on mutans streptococci colonization.
    Brambilla E, Cagetti MG, Gagliani M, Fadini L, García-Godoy F, Strohmenger L.
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 16158808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of different resin-based restorative materials on mutans streptococci adhesion. An in vitro study.
    Osorio E, Osorio R, Toledano M, Quevedo-Sarmiento J, Ruiz-Bravo A.
    Am J Dent; 2010 Oct; 23(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 21207795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
    Sousa RP, Zanin IC, Lima JP, Vasconcelos SM, Melo MA, Beltrão HC, Rodrigues LK.
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Antibacterial activity of resin adhesives, glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer in contact with dentin caries samples.
    Herrera M, Castillo A, Bravo M, Liébana J, Carrión P.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jan; 25(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 11203829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Temperature mediated coefficient of dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Sidhu SK, Carrick TE, McCabe JF.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 15081549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system.
    Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, Pfister W.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15025662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci.
    Berg JH, Farrell JE, Brown LR.
    Pediatr Dent; 1990 Feb; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2119036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA, Mortier E, Droz D.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008 Feb; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The influence of light-curing time on the bacterial colonization of resin composite surfaces.
    Brambilla E, Gagliani M, Ionescu A, Fadini L, García-Godoy F.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Sep; 25(9):1067-72. PubMed ID: 19375790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Growth inhibition of glass ionomer cements on mutans streptococci.
    Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Garcia-Godoy F, Lindquist R.
    Pediatr Dent; 1994 Sep; 16(5):346-9. PubMed ID: 7831139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The influence of 30-day-old Streptococcus mutans biofilm on the surface of esthetic restorative materials--an in vitro study.
    Fúcio SB, Carvalho FG, Sobrinho LC, Sinhoreti MA, Puppin-Rontani RM.
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 18621456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Antibacterial surface properties of various fluoride-releasing restorative materials in vitro.
    Sungurtekin-Ekci E, Ozdemir-Ozenen D, Duman S, Acuner IC, Sandalli N.
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2015 Jul 04; 13(2):e169-73. PubMed ID: 25363077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials.
    Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, Donati ME, Breschi L, Prati C, Arciola CR.
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug 04; 25(18):4457-63. PubMed ID: 15046936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Ertuğrul F, Eltem R, Eronat C.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003 Aug 04; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Early biofilm formation and the effects of antimicrobial agents on orthodontic bonding materials in a parallel plate flow chamber.
    Chin MY, Busscher HJ, Evans R, Noar J, Pratten J.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb 04; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16373451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Streptococcus Mutans Biofilm Influences on the Antimicrobial Properties of Glass Ionomer Cements.
    Fúcio SB, Paula AB, Sardi JC, Duque C, Correr-Sobrinho L, Puppin-Rontani RM.
    Braz Dent J; 2016 Feb 04; 27(6):681-687. PubMed ID: 27982179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of different self-etching primers and adhesives.
    Korkmaz Y, Ozalp M, Attar N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov 01; 9(7):57-64. PubMed ID: 18997917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Analyses of biofilms accumulated on dental restorative materials.
    de Fúcio SB, Puppin-Rontani RM, de Carvalho FG, Mattos-Graner Rde O, Correr-Sobrinho L, Garcia-Godoy F.
    Am J Dent; 2009 Jun 01; 22(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 19650591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Localized wear of compomer restorative materials.
    Latta MA, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM, Blake SM.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug 01; 14(4):238-40. PubMed ID: 11699744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ability of different restorative materials to prevent in situ secondary caries: analysis by polarized light-microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray.
    Paradella TC, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Aug 01; 116(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 18705806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.