These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Adaptation shapes patterns of genome evolution on sexual and asexual chromosomes in Drosophila. Bachtrog D. Nat Genet; 2003 Jun 20; 34(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 12754509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced effectiveness of selection caused by a lack of recombination. Betancourt AJ, Welch JJ, Charlesworth B. Curr Biol; 2009 Apr 28; 19(8):655-60. PubMed ID: 19285399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila. Comeron JM, Guthrie TB. Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec 28; 22(12):2519-30. PubMed ID: 16120803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence that positive selection drives Y-chromosome degeneration in Drosophila miranda. Bachtrog D. Nat Genet; 2004 May 28; 36(5):518-22. PubMed ID: 15107853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Haag-Liautard C, Dorris M, Maside X, Macaskill S, Halligan DL, Houle D, Charlesworth B, Keightley PD. Nature; 2007 Jan 04; 445(7123):82-5. PubMed ID: 17203060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Local effects of limited recombination: historical perspective and consequences for population estimates of adaptive evolution. Williford A, Comeron JM. J Hered; 2010 Jan 04; 101 Suppl 1():S127-34. PubMed ID: 20421321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila. Akashi H, Kliman RM, Eyre-Walker A. Genetica; 1998 Jan 04; 102-103(1-6):49-60. PubMed ID: 9720271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual recombination and the power of natural selection. Rice WR, Chippindale AK. Science; 2001 Oct 19; 294(5542):555-9. PubMed ID: 11641490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in the pattern of evolution in six physically linked genes of Drosophila melanogaster. Zurovcová M, Tatarenkov A, Berec L. Gene; 2006 Oct 15; 381():24-33. PubMed ID: 16914271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic recombination and adaptation to fluctuating environments: selection for geotaxis in Drosophila melanogaster. Bourguet D, Gair J, Mattice M, Whitlock MC. Heredity (Edinb); 2003 Jul 15; 91(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 12815456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Chromosomal effects of rapid gene evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Nurminsky D, Aguiar DD, Bustamante CD, Hartl DL. Science; 2001 Jan 05; 291(5501):128-30. PubMed ID: 11141564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mating-induced recombination in fruit flies. Priest NK, Roach DA, Galloway LF. Evolution; 2007 Jan 05; 61(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 17300435 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Why sex and recombination? Barton NH. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009 Jan 05; 74():187-95. PubMed ID: 19903748 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexual selection and maintenance of sex: evidence from comparisons of rates of genomic accumulation of mutations and divergence of sex-related genes in sexual and hermaphroditic species of Caenorhabditis. Artieri CG, Haerty W, Gupta BP, Singh RS. Mol Biol Evol; 2008 May 05; 25(5):972-9. PubMed ID: 18281268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic recombination and molecular evolution. Charlesworth B, Betancourt AJ, Kaiser VB, Gordo I. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009 May 05; 74():177-86. PubMed ID: 19734202 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid evolution of outer egg membrane proteins in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup: a case of ecologically driven evolution of female reproductive traits. Jagadeeshan S, Singh RS. Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Apr 05; 24(4):929-38. PubMed ID: 17244601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations. Keightley PD, Otto SP. Nature; 2006 Sep 07; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks. Azevedo RB, Lohaus R, Srinivasan S, Dang KK, Burch CL. Nature; 2006 Mar 02; 440(7080):87-90. PubMed ID: 16511495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolutionary traction: the cost of adaptation and the evolution of sex. Hadany L, Feldman MW. J Evol Biol; 2005 Mar 02; 18(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 15715837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]