These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 16177523

  • 1. High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor.
    Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Onishi SK.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep 07; 50(17):3957-69. PubMed ID: 16177523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 21; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
    Elbakri IA, Tesic MM, Xiong Q.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr 21; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography.
    Lazzari B, Belli G, Gori C, Rosselli Del Turco M.
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul 21; 34(7):2730-43. PubMed ID: 17821981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep 21; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.
    Saunders RS, Samei E, Jesneck JL, Lo JY.
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb 21; 32(2):588-99. PubMed ID: 15789606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
    El-Mohri Y, Antonuk LE, Zhao Q, Wang Y, Li Y, Du H, Sawant A.
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan 21; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W, Ji WG, Debrie A, Rowlands JA.
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb 21; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype.
    Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Albagli D, Han S, Tkaczyk EJ, Landberg CE, Opsahl-Ong B, Granfors PR, Levis I, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE.
    Med Phys; 2000 Mar 21; 27(3):558-67. PubMed ID: 10757607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ, Samei E.
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr 21; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW, Lemmens K, Bosmans H.
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb 21; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Theoretical analysis of high-resolution digital mammography.
    Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Sechopoulos I.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun 21; 51(12):3041-55. PubMed ID: 16757861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
    Hunt DC, Tousignant O, Rowlands JA.
    Med Phys; 2004 May 21; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May 07; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
    Zhao C, Kanicki J, Konstantinidis AC, Patel T.
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov 07; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis.
    Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Campanini R, Bertolini M, Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Danielli C, Angelini L, Maggi S.
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov 07; 33(11):4198-209. PubMed ID: 17153399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of cassette type on the DQE of CR systems.
    Monnin P, Holzer Z, Wolf R, Neitzel U, Vock P, Gudinchet F, Verdun FR.
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct 07; 33(10):3637-9. PubMed ID: 17089829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors.
    Ghetti C, Borrini A, Ortenzia O, Rossi R, Ordóñez PL.
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb 07; 35(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 18383665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology.
    Monnin P, Holzer Z, Wolf R, Neitzel U, Vock P, Gudinchet F, Verdun FR.
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb 07; 33(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 16532949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors.
    Aslund M, Cederström B, Lundqvist M, Danielsson M.
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun 07; 34(6):1918-25. PubMed ID: 17654894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.