These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 1618011

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
    Wall M, Kutzko KE, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects using masking campimetry].
    Damm G, Lachenmayr BJ, Vivell PM.
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991 Jan; 88(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 1794816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Teesalu P, Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A.
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [The Fieldmaster-200 computer perimeter: a comparative, controlled clinical study of its sensitivity and specificity in glaucomatous field defects (author's transl)].
    Krieglstein GK, Glaab E, Gramer E.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 Nov; 179(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7040780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Static vs dynamic visual field evaluation; with emphasis on the utility of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer.
    Yellen M, Sherman J.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jan; 50(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 762380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Perimetry in glaucoma. Liminal and supraliminal stimuli (author's transl)].
    Dannheim F.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1978 Aug; 173(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 703148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Glaucomatous visual fields: observation of development with the Octopus automatic perimeter (author's transl)].
    Gloor B, Fässler A, Lüdin B.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1980 Dec; 177(6):748-52. PubMed ID: 7206564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Free static threshold perimetry with the Goldmann perimeter].
    Fischer FW.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Apr; 186(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 3999619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Trope GE, Britton R.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.