These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
258 related items for PubMed ID: 16180972
1. Hearing screening outcomes in infants of pregestational diabetic mothers. Stanton SG, Ryerson E, Moore SL, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Couch SC. Am J Audiol; 2005 Jun; 14(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 16180972 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE, Gravel JS, James M, Kennalley T, Maxon AB, Spivak L, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Vohr BR, Weirather Y, Holstrum J. Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening. Korres SG, Balatsouras DG, Lyra C, Kandiloros D, Ferekidis E. Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates]. Xu FL, Xing QJ, Cheng XY. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Extremely low birth weight infants are at high risk for auditory neuropathy. Xoinis K, Weirather Y, Mavoori H, Shaha SH, Iwamoto LM. J Perinatol; 2007 Nov; 27(11):718-23. PubMed ID: 17703185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study]. Huang LH, Deng XQ, Yang YL, Wang SJ, Tang XQ, Guo LS, Han DM. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: research design and results of the study. White KR, Vohr BR, Meyer S, Widen JE, Johnson JL, Gravel JS, James M, Kennalley T, Maxon AB, Spivak L, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Weirather Y. Am J Audiol; 2005 Dec; 14(2):S186-199. PubMed ID: 16489863 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response. Suppiej A, Rizzardi E, Zanardo V, Franzoi M, Ermani M, Orzan E. Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: introduction and overview of the study. Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE, Gravel JS, Vohr BR, James M, Kennalley T, Maxon AB, Spivak L, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Weirather Y, Meyer S. Am J Audiol; 2005 Dec; 14(2):S178-85. PubMed ID: 16489862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline. Tsui PW, McPherson B, Wong EC, Ng IH. Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing impairment in the neonate of preeclamptic women. Bakhshaee M, Boskabadi H, Hassanzadeh M, Nourizadeh N, Ghassemi MM, Khazaeni K, Moghiman T, Tale MR. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):846-9. PubMed ID: 19041514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain-stem response in neonatal hearing screening, a comparative study]. Xu ZM, Li J, Hu TZ, Sun JH, Shen XM. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb 25; 83(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12812641 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Universal newborn hearing screening: are we achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) objectives? Connolly JL, Carron JD, Roark SD. Laryngoscope; 2005 Feb 25; 115(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 15689741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life. Prieve BA, Hancur-Bucci CA, Preston JL. Ear Hear; 2009 Jun 25; 30(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 19322090 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response. Lin HC, Shu MT, Lee KS, Ho GM, Fu TY, Bruna S, Lin G. Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov 25; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns. De Capua B, Costantini D, Martufi C, Latini G, Gentile M, De Felice C. Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep 25; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial audiologic assessment of infants referred from well baby, special care, and neonatal intensive care unit nurseries. Karzon RK, Lieu JE. Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun 25; 15(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16803788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Follow-up default in a hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening programme in a low-income country. Olusanya BO. Child Care Health Dev; 2009 Mar 25; 35(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 19228154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program. Kirkim G, Serbetcioglu B, Erdag TK, Ceryan K. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct 25; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]