These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

376 related items for PubMed ID: 16184655

  • 21. Autonomy, consent, and the conflict of rights in health care.
    Procaccino JA.
    Air Force Law Rev; 1990; 33():183-91. PubMed ID: 15991412
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA.
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
    Tweedt DE.
    Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives.
    Horttor BJ.
    N D Law Rev; 1998; 74(2):233-93. PubMed ID: 16437813
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. 2008-2009 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: best brief.
    Bonsall L, Weber T.
    J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):467-94. PubMed ID: 19953403
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. 2008-2009 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: problem.
    Pope T.
    J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):443-66. PubMed ID: 19953402
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
    McLean ED.
    Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A civil liberties analysis of surrogacy arrangements.
    Gostin L.
    Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 3060686
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [End-of-life decisions for patients with dementia and the vegetative state].
    Jox RJ, Kühlmeyer K, Borasio GD.
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2011 Sep 15; 153(37):31-2, 34. PubMed ID: 21950185
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
    O'Brien EJ.
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992 Sep 15; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment.
    Cherry AL.
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002 Sep 15; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. A maternal duty to protect fetal health?
    Weinberg SR.
    Indiana Law J; 1983 Sep 15; 58(3):531-46. PubMed ID: 16211746
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The constitutionality of abortion on request in South Africa.
    McGregor M, Moore R.
    E Law; 1995 Dec 15; 2(3):E3. PubMed ID: 16967565
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
    Bower HR.
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec 15; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
    Pachman TS.
    Columbia J Gend Law; 2003 Dec 15; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion.
    Walen A.
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997 Dec 15; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
    Siano JR.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998 Dec 15; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Fetal rights and the prosecution of women for using drugs during pregnancy.
    Janssen ND.
    Drake Law Rev; 2000 Dec 15; 48(4):741-68. PubMed ID: 12449973
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N.
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar 15; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women: the balancing of maternal and fetal rights.
    Harris P.
    Clevel State Law Rev; 2001 Mar 15; 49(1):133-61. PubMed ID: 15212015
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.