These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1109 related items for PubMed ID: 16186436

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical characteristics and early mortality of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared to percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) and the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) Registries.
    Yan BP, Clark DJ, Buxton B, Ajani AE, Smith JA, Duffy SJ, Shardey GC, Skillington PD, Farouque O, Yii M, Yap CH, Andrianopoulos N, Brennan A, Dinh D, Reid CM, Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS), Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG).
    Heart Lung Circ; 2009 Jun; 18(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 19268632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease?
    Mehta RH, Lopes RD, Ballotta A, Frigiola A, Sketch MH, Bossone E, Bates ER.
    Am Heart J; 2010 Jan; 159(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 20102880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Functional status and quality of life after emergency revascularization for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
    Sleeper LA, Ramanathan K, Picard MH, Lejemtel TH, White HD, Dzavik V, Tormey D, Avis NE, Hochman JS, SHOCK Investigators.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jul 19; 46(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 16022953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery provides better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experiencing cardiogenic shock after percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis.
    Chiu FC, Chang SN, Lin JW, Hwang JJ, Chen YS.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Dec 19; 138(6):1326-30. PubMed ID: 19660378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Javaid A, Steinberg DH, Buch AN, Corso PJ, Boyce SW, Pinto Slottow TL, Roy PK, Hill P, Okabe T, Torguson R, Smith KA, Xue Z, Gevorkian N, Suddath WO, Kent KM, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R.
    Circulation; 2007 Sep 11; 116(11 Suppl):I200-6. PubMed ID: 17846304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Clinical outcome of emergency off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting].
    Takemura T, Shimamura Y, Tsuda Y, Iwasa S, Agematsu K.
    Kyobu Geka; 2003 Jul 11; 56(8 Suppl):672-7. PubMed ID: 12910949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of hospital mortality with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation insertion before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
    Abdel-Wahab M, Saad M, Kynast J, Geist V, Sherif MA, Richardt G, Toelg R.
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Apr 01; 105(7):967-71. PubMed ID: 20346314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Five-year follow-up of the Argentine randomized trial of coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI II).
    Rodriguez AE, Baldi J, Fernández Pereira C, Navia J, Rodriguez Alemparte M, Delacasa A, Vigo F, Vogel D, O'Neill W, Palacios IF, ERACI II Investigators.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Aug 16; 46(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 16098419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.
    Kunadian B, Vijayalakshmi K, Dunning J, Thornley AR, Sutton AG, Muir DF, Wright RA, Hall JA, de Belder MA.
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 May 16; 19(5):217-23. PubMed ID: 17476036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Balancing benefit against risk in the choice of therapy for coronary artery disease. Lesson from prospective, randomized, clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Morrison DA, Sacks J.
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2003 Oct 16; 51(5):585-97. PubMed ID: 14551526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Patients enrolled in coronary intervention trials are not representative of patients in clinical practice: results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization.
    Hordijk-Trion M, Lenzen M, Wijns W, de Jaegere P, Simoons ML, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Bertrand ME, Mercado N, Boersma E, EHS-CR Investigators.
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Mar 16; 27(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 16423872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention in prevention of perioperative myocardial infarctions during subsequent vascular surgery.
    Ward HB, Kelly RF, Thottapurathu L, Moritz TE, Larsen GC, Pierpont G, Santilli S, Goldman S, Krupski WC, Littooy F, Reda DJ, McFalls EO.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep 16; 82(3):795-800; discussion 800-1. PubMed ID: 16928485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.