These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 16201648

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A direct passive method for measuring water and contaminant fluxes in porous media.
    Hatfield K, Annable M, Cho J, Rao PS, Klammler H.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Dec; 75(3-4):155-81. PubMed ID: 15610899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Oxyanion flux characterization using passive flux meters: development and field testing of surfactant-modified granular activated carbon.
    Lee J, Rao PS, Poyer IC, Toole RM, Annable MD, Hatfield K.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jul 17; 92(3-4):208-29. PubMed ID: 17316893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Field demonstration and evaluation of the Passive Flux Meter on a CAH groundwater plume.
    Verreydt G, Annable MD, Kaskassian S, Van Keer I, Bronders J, Diels L, Vanderauwera P.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Jul 17; 20(7):4621-34. PubMed ID: 23283755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Magnitude and directional measures of water and Cr(VI) fluxes by passive flux meter.
    Campbell TJ, Hatfield K, Klammler H, Annable MD, Rao PS.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Oct 15; 40(20):6392-7. PubMed ID: 17120570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Validation of two innovative methods to measure contaminant mass flux in groundwater.
    Goltz MN, Close ME, Yoon H, Huang J, Flintoft MJ, Kim S, Enfield C.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr 15; 106(1-2):51-61. PubMed ID: 19215996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Quantification of mass fluxes and natural attenuation rates at an industrial site with a limited monitoring network: a case study.
    Bockelmann A, Zamfirescu D, Ptak T, Grathwohl P, Teutsch G.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Jan 15; 60(1-2):97-121. PubMed ID: 12498576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of temporally variable groundwater flow conditions on point measurements and contaminant mass flux estimations.
    Rein A, Bauer S, Dietrich P, Beyer C.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Sep 01; 108(3-4):118-33. PubMed ID: 19682766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Estimating contaminant mass discharge: a field comparison of the multilevel point measurement and the integral pumping investigation approaches and their uncertainties.
    Béland-Pelletier C, Fraser M, Barker J, Ptak T.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Mar 25; 122(1-4):63-75. PubMed ID: 21146251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of groundwater velocity on sampling intervals for contaminant-detection networks in aquifers.
    Hudak PF.
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2001 Mar 25; 36(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 11381781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Significance of groundwater flux on contaminant concentration and mass discharge in the nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) contaminated zone.
    Zhu J, Sun D.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Sep 25; 192():158-164. PubMed ID: 27500747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.