These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
139 related items for PubMed ID: 16204134
1. The contribution of the subjective component of the Canadian Pulmonary Embolism Score to the overall score in emergency department patients. Kabrhel C, McAfee AT, Goldhaber SZ. Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 12(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 16204134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study. Kabrhel C. J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An emergency department guideline for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: an outcome study. Brown MD, Vance SJ, Kline JA. Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Jan; 12(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 15635133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential impact of adjusting the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer based on pretest probability of acute pulmonary embolism. Kabrhel C, Mark Courtney D, Camargo CA, Moore CL, Richman PB, Plewa MC, Nordenholtz KE, Smithline HA, Beam DM, Brown MD, Kline JA. Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 19298619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Wolf SJ, McCubbin TR, Nordenholz KE, Naviaux NW, Haukoos JS. Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Feb; 26(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 18272098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the unstructured clinician estimate of pretest probability for pulmonary embolism to the Canadian score and the Charlotte rule: a prospective observational study. Runyon MS, Webb WB, Jones AE, Kline JA. Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Jul; 12(7):587-93. PubMed ID: 15995088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of D-dimer testing for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in patients with previous venous thromboembolism. Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Aujesky D, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Arch Intern Med; 2006 Jan 23; 166(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 16432085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tandem measurement of D-dimer and myeloperoxidase or C-reactive protein to effectively screen for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Mitchell AM, Nordenholz KE, Kline JA. Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Sep 23; 15(9):800-5. PubMed ID: 18821859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The incremental benefit of a shortness-of-breath biomarker panel in emergency department patients with dyspnea. Singer AJ, Thode HC, Green GB, Birkhahn R, Shapiro NI, Cairns C, Baumann BM, Aghababian R, Char D, Hollander JE. Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jun 23; 16(6):488-94. PubMed ID: 19388909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. C-reactive protein and D-dimer with clinical probability score in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism. Steeghs N, Goekoop RJ, Niessen RW, Jonkers GJ, Dik H, Huisman MV. Br J Haematol; 2005 Aug 23; 130(4):614-9. PubMed ID: 16098077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical utility of clinical prediction rules for suspected acute pulmonary embolism in a large academic institution. Moores LK, Collen JF, Woods KM, Shorr AF. Thromb Res; 2004 Aug 23; 113(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15081559 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pulmonary embolism risk assessment screening tools: the interrater reliability of their criteria. Nordenholz KE, Naviaux NW, Stegelmeier K, Haukoos JS, Wolf SJ, McCubbin T, Heard K. Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Mar 23; 25(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 17349902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside with low pre-test probability and D-dimer: safety and clinical utility of 4 methods to assign pre-test probability. Carrier M, Wells PS, Rodger MA. Thromb Res; 2006 Mar 23; 117(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 15893807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of pretest probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department by physicians in training using the Wells model. Penaloza A, Mélot C, Dochy E, Blocklet D, Gevenois PA, Wautrecht JC, Lheureux P, Motte S. Thromb Res; 2007 Mar 23; 120(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17055556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of a clinical prognostic model to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism. Aujesky D, Perrier A, Roy PM, Stone RA, Cornuz J, Meyer G, Obrosky DS, Fine MJ. J Intern Med; 2007 Jun 23; 261(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 17547715 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing the use of diagnostic imaging in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: validation of a risk assessment strategy. Goergen SK, Chan T, de Campo JF, Wolfe R, Gan E, Wheeler M, McKay J. Emerg Med Australas; 2005 Feb 23; 17(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 15675900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Appropriateness of diagnostic strategies for evaluating suspected venous thromboembolism. Arnason T, Wells PS, Forster AJ. Thromb Haemost; 2007 Feb 23; 97(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 17264947 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical usefulness of D-dimer testing in cancer patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Righini M, Le Gal G, De Lucia S, Roy PM, Meyer G, Aujesky D, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Thromb Haemost; 2006 Apr 23; 95(4):715-9. PubMed ID: 16601844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive value of the high-sensitivity troponin T assay and the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective validation study. Lankeit M, Jiménez D, Kostrubiec M, Dellas C, Hasenfuss G, Pruszczyk P, Konstantinides S. Circulation; 2011 Dec 13; 124(24):2716-24. PubMed ID: 22082681 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of the simplify D-dimer assay for pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients. Kline JA, Runyon MS, Webb WB, Jones AE, Mitchell AM. Chest; 2006 Jun 13; 129(6):1417-23. PubMed ID: 16778257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]