These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

136 related items for PubMed ID: 16205444

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of the automated non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTRU) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population.
    Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM.
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15021077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Overall accuracy of the BpTRU--an automated electronic blood pressure device.
    Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM.
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 15021078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Optimising the accuracy of blood pressure monitoring in chronic kidney disease: the utility of BpTRU.
    Brothwell S, Dutton M, Ferro C, Stringer S, Cockwell P.
    BMC Nephrol; 2013 Oct 10; 14():218. PubMed ID: 24112304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings.
    Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A.
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun 10; 14(3):108-11. PubMed ID: 19417634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical decision-making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU) measurement device.
    Graves JW, Nash C, Burger K, Bailey K, Sheps SG.
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec 10; 17(12):823-7. PubMed ID: 14704726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Automated blood pressure measurement in routine clinical practice.
    Myers MG.
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr 10; 11(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 16534406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of Different Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement Devices: Evidence of Nonequivalence and Clinical Implications.
    Rinfret F, Cloutier L, Wistaff R, Birnbaum LM, Ng Cheong N, Laskine M, Roederer G, Van Nguyen P, Bertrand M, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Dufour R, Lamarre-Cliche M.
    Can J Cardiol; 2017 Dec 10; 33(12):1639-1644. PubMed ID: 29173603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Misclassification of blood pressure by usual measurement in ambulatory physician practices.
    Campbell NR, Culleton BW, McKay DW.
    Am J Hypertens; 2005 Dec 10; 18(12 Pt 1):1522-7. PubMed ID: 16364819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Long-term relationship between unattended automated blood pressure and auscultatory BP measurements in hypertensive patients.
    Seidlerová J, Ceral J, Mateřánková M, König P, Řiháček I, Vysočanová P, Souček M, Filipovský J.
    Blood Press; 2019 Feb 10; 28(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 30474412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.