These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

468 related items for PubMed ID: 16212074

  • 1. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study.
    Moro E, Caprioglio F, Berton G, Marcon C, Riva U, Corbucci G, Delise P.
    Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial: rationale, design, results, clinical implications and lessons for future trials.
    Wilkoff BL, Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator trial investigators.
    Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 15071277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [The effect of changes in stroke volume on QT dispersion during long-term DDD and VVI pacing].
    Lelakowski J, Majewski J, Bednarek J, Szczepkowski J, Machejek J.
    Przegl Lek; 2001 Dec; 58(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11475854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence.
    Maity AK, Ghosh SP, Dasbiswas A, Chatterjee SS, Chaudhury D, Das MK.
    Indian Heart J; 1992 Dec; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 1289220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
    Occhetta E, Perucca A, Fazzari M, Pistis G, Baduini G, Trevi G.
    Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Single-chamber ventricular pacing increases markers of left ventricular dysfunction compared with dual-chamber pacing.
    Naegeli B, Kurz DJ, Koller D, Straumann E, Furrer M, Maurer D, Minder E, Bertel O.
    Europace; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 17272326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block.
    Hargreaves MR, Channon KM, Cripps TR, Gardner M, Ormerod OJ.
    Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessment of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction after cardiac pacing in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function.
    Kachboura S, Ben Halima A, Fersi I, Marrakchi S, Zouaoui W, Kammoun I.
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2008 Feb; 57(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 18062936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Treatment crossovers did not affect randomized treatment comparisons in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST).
    Hellkamp AS, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Link MS, Lamas GA, MOST Investigators.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jun 06; 47(11):2260-6. PubMed ID: 16750693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.