These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

418 related items for PubMed ID: 16217470

  • 21. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
    Lau JC, Li-Tsang CW, Zheng YP.
    Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The Comparison of Scars in Breast Implantation Surgery with Inframammary Fold Incision Versus Axillary Incision: A Prospective Cohort Study in Chinese Patients.
    Sun J, Mu D, Liu C, Xin M, Fu S, Chen L, Liu W, Luan J.
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Apr; 43(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 30607574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Patient-and observer-reported long-term scar quality of wide local excision scars in melanoma patients.
    Weitemeyer MB, Bramsen P, Klausen TW, Hölmich LR, Gjorup CA.
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2018 Dec; 52(6):319-324. PubMed ID: 30380964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
    Gankande TU, Duke JM, Danielsen PL, DeJong HM, Wood FM, Wallace HJ.
    Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
    Gankande TU, Wood FM, Edgar DW, Duke JM, DeJong HM, Henderson AE, Wallace HJ.
    Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity.
    De Groef A, Van Kampen M, Moortgat P, Anthonissen M, Van den Kerckhove E, Christiaens MR, Neven P, Geraerts I, Devoogdt N.
    PLoS One; 2018 Sep; 13(3):e0193915. PubMed ID: 29522540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume.
    Nedelec B, Shankowsky HA, Tredget EE.
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2000 Sep; 21(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 10850901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The use of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and rating scale to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of totally thoracoscopic cardiac surgery.
    Huang LC, Chen DZ, Chen LW, Xu QC, Zheng ZH, Dai XF.
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Sep 11; 15(1):250. PubMed ID: 32917246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Quantitative and qualitative dermal change with microfat grafting of facial scars.
    Sardesai MG, Moore CC.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Dec 11; 137(6):868-72. PubMed ID: 18036412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A prospective comparative study of radiotherapy effect upon scar quality.
    Moon SJ, Byun IH, Chang JS, Song SY, Lee WJ, Lee DW.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Aug 11; 74(8):1801-1806. PubMed ID: 33358674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
    Forbes-Duchart L, Marshall S, Strock A, Cooper JE.
    J Burn Care Res; 2007 Aug 11; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.
    Tyack Z, Simons M, Spinks A, Wasiak J.
    Burns; 2012 Feb 11; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools.
    Lee KC, Bamford A, Gardiner F, Agovino A, Ter Horst B, Bishop J, Sitch A, Grover L, Logan A, Moiemen NS.
    Burns; 2019 Sep 11; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
    Vercelli S, Ferriero G, Sartorio F, Stissi V, Franchignoni F.
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009 Sep 11; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Skin elasticity meter or subjective evaluation in scars: a reliability assessment.
    Draaijers LJ, Botman YA, Tempelman FR, Kreis RW, Middelkoop E, van Zuijlen PP.
    Burns; 2004 Mar 11; 30(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 15019116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Objective color measurements: clinimetric performance of three devices on normal skin and scar tissue.
    van der Wal M, Bloemen M, Verhaegen P, Tuinebreijer W, de Vet H, van Zuijlen P, Middelkoop E.
    J Burn Care Res; 2013 Mar 11; 34(3):e187-94. PubMed ID: 23237819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Postbariatric Brachioplasty with Posteromedial Scar: Physical Model, Technical Refinements, and Clinical Outcomes.
    Simone P, Carusi C, Segreto F, Iannuzzi R, Buscaglione S, Gizzi A, Giannitelli S, Rainer A, Filippi S, Persichetti P.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb 11; 141(2):344-353. PubMed ID: 29369986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Clinical effects of sequential laser treatments on early stage hypertrophic burn scars].
    Xie WG, Lei F, Wang J, Xu J, Ruan JJ, Li Z.
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Sep 20; 34(9):615-623. PubMed ID: 30293365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.