These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

389 related items for PubMed ID: 16218317

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Current cervical cancer screening practices of Dane County, Wisconsin primary care clinicians.
    Marchand L, Van Dinter M, Mundt M, Dingel W, Klein G.
    WMJ; 2003; 102(3):35-40. PubMed ID: 12822288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component.
    Selvaggi SM, Guidos BJ.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10907927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
    Ivanov S.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007 Jul; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A continuous quality improvement project to improve the quality of cervical Papanicolaou smears.
    Burkman RT, Ward R, Balchandani K, Kini S.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):470-5. PubMed ID: 8058251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.
    Arbyn M, Herbert A, Schenck U, Nieminen P, Jordan J, Mcgoogan E, Patnick J, Bergeron C, Baldauf JJ, Klinkhamer P, Bulten J, Martin-Hirsch P.
    Cytopathology; 2007 Jun; 18(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 17573762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling.
    Stock RJ, Thurmond AI, Passmore A.
    Acta Cytol; 1988 Oct; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Oct; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
    Lellé RJ, Cordes A, Regidor M, Maier E, Flenker H.
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007 Oct; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T, Knight AL, Elswick RK.
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of using the Cervex-Brush (broom) compared to the elongated spatula for collection of conventional cervical cytology samples within a high-burden HIV setting: a model-based analysis.
    Schnippel K, Michelow P, Chibwesha CJ, Makura C, Lince-Deroche N, Goeieman B, Mulongo M, Jordaan S, Firnhaber C.
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Nov 06; 15():499. PubMed ID: 26545585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G, Graham L, Cannon D, Waters K, Feller D.
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov 06; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L, Jordan J.
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep 06; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Sep 06; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.
    Neinstein LS, Church J, Akiyoshi T.
    J Adolesc Health; 1992 Sep 06; 13(6):520-3. PubMed ID: 1390820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.