These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
569 related items for PubMed ID: 16218434
21. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment. Schiffman RM, Jacobsen G, Nussbaum JJ, Desai UR, Carey JD, Glasser D, Zimmer-Galler IE, Zeimer R, Goldberg MF. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Classification of diabetic retinopathy from fluorescein angiograms. ETDRS report number 11. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology; 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):807-22. PubMed ID: 2062514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Non-mydriatic fundus photography: a viable alternative to fundoscopy for identification of diabetic retinopathy in an Aboriginal population in rural Western Australia? Diamond JP, McKinnon M, Barry C, Geary D, McAllister IL, House P, Constable IJ. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 9630290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmire-Peters D, Aiello LP, Aiello LM, Joslin Vision Network Research Team. Ophthalmology; 2001 Mar; 108(3):572-85. PubMed ID: 11237913 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Relation between retinal thickening and clinically visible fundus pathologies in mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Nishiwaki H, Shahidi M, Vitale S, Alexander J, Asran S, Mori M, Blair NP, Zeimer R. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2002 Mar; 33(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 11942544 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Venous beading in two or more quadrants might not be a sensitive grading criterion for severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Chen L, Zhang X, Wen F. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 256(6):1059-1065. PubMed ID: 29626228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography. Aptel F, Denis P, Rouberol F, Thivolet C. Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]