These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
143 related items for PubMed ID: 16223516
1. Assessing effects of fixation demands on perception of lateralized words: A visual window technique for studying hemispheric asymmetry. Jordan TR, Patching GR. Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 16223516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect. Jordan TR, Patching GR. Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Central fixations are inadequately controlled by instructions alone: implications for studying cerebral asymmetry. Jordan TR, Patching GR, Milner AD. Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 May; 51(2):371-91. PubMed ID: 9621844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials. Simola J, Holmqvist K, Lindgren M. Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance. Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Stachurski M. Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length. Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Stachurski M. Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: what you get is often not what you see. Jordan TR, Patching GR. Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 14599270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of form familiarity on perception of words, pseudowords, and nonwords in the two cerebral hemispheres. Jordan TR, Redwood M, Patching GR. J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 May 15; 15(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 12803965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process? Handy TC, Khoe W. J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec 15; 17(12):1936-49. PubMed ID: 16356330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial visual information determines endpoint precision for rapid pointing. Ma-Wyatt A, McKee SP. Vision Res; 2006 Dec 15; 46(28):4675-83. PubMed ID: 17070889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemiface contributions to hemispheric dominance in visual speech perception. Jordan TR, Thomas SM. Neuropsychology; 2007 Nov 15; 21(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17983286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect. Van Vleet TM, Robertson LC. J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug 15; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemispheric metacontrol and cerebral dominance in healthy individuals investigated by means of chimeric faces. Urgesi C, Bricolo E, Aglioti SM. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug 15; 24(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 16099363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The course of visual searching to a target in a fixed location: electrophysiological evidence from an emotional flanker task. Dong G, Yang L, Shen Y. Neurosci Lett; 2009 Aug 21; 460(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19446605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Audio-visual stimulation improves oculomotor patterns in patients with hemianopia. Passamonti C, Bertini C, Làdavas E. Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan 21; 47(2):546-55. PubMed ID: 18983860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]