These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

227 related items for PubMed ID: 16232178

  • 1. Variables that predict the success of labor induction.
    Bueno B, San-Frutos L, Salazar F, Pérez-Medina T, Engels V, Archilla B, Izquierdo F, Bajo J.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 16232178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The labor induction: integrated clinical and sonographic variables that predict the outcome.
    Bueno B, San-Frutos L, Pérez-Medina T, Barbancho C, Troyano J, Bajo J.
    J Perinatol; 2007 Jan; 27(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 17180126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Strobel E, Sladkevicius P, Rovas L, De Smet F, Karlsson ED, Valentin L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, Quek KF, Hassan J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?
    Roman H, Verspyck E, Vercoustre L, Degre S, Col JY, Firmin JM, Caron P, Marpeau L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 15065185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
    Gómez-Laencina AM, García CP, Asensio LV, Ponce JA, Martínez MS, Martínez-Vizcaíno V.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
    Gómez Laencina AM, Sánchez FG, Gimenez JH, Martínez MS, Valverde Martínez JA, Vizcaíno VM.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Jun; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM, Heien C, Økland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length.
    Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 May; 17(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 16147844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women.
    Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Hatziioannou L, Mesogitis S, Papantoniou N, Antsaklis A.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2006 May; 21(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 16354972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
    Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, Abdel-Aziz E, Bradley M.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M, Bougmiza I, Ben Hmid R, Abdelfatteh W, Mahjoub S, Channoufi MB.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
    Han BR, Park KH, Lee SY, Jung EY, Park JW.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Ultrasonographic and clinical methods in the management of prolonged pregnancy].
    Rosati P, Ciliberti P, Buongiorno S, Alessio A, Mappa I, Guariglia L, Capelli G, Scambia G.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2014 Apr; 66(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 24848077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
    Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, Gonzalez N, Leymarie F, Quereux C.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.
    Park KH.
    J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 22(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 17728517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.
    Park KH, Kim SN, Lee SY, Jeong EH, Jung HJ, Oh KJ.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21484904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir BC, Baytur Y.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.