These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
243 related items for PubMed ID: 16235750
41. Assessment of the best available wastewater management techniques for a textile mill: cost and benefit analysis. Dogan B, Kerestecioglu M, Yetis U. Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):963-70. PubMed ID: 20182075 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Pilot study of a submerged membrane bioreactor for water reclamation. Qin JJ, Oo MH, Tao G, Kekre KA, Hashimoto T. Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(12):3269-74. PubMed ID: 19955652 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Combined biological and membrane treatment of food-processing wastewater to achieve dry-ditch criteria: pilot and full-scale performance. Nakhla G, Lugowski A, Patel J, Rivest V. Bioresour Technol; 2006 Jan; 97(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15925509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Factors governing performance of continuous fungal reactor during non-sterile operation--the case of a membrane bioreactor treating textile wastewater. Hai FI, Yamamoto K, Nakajima F, Fukushi K. Chemosphere; 2009 Feb; 74(6):810-7. PubMed ID: 19041114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. MBR-technology in municipal wastewater treatment: challenging the traditional treatment technologies. van der Roest HF, van Bentem AG, Lawrence DP. Water Sci Technol; 2002 Feb; 46(4-5):273-80. PubMed ID: 12361021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Pumped flow biofilm reactors (PFBR) for treating municipal wastewater. O'Reilly E, Rodgers M, Zhan XM. Water Sci Technol; 2008 Feb; 57(12):1857-65. PubMed ID: 18587171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Treatment of textile dyes in two-phase and single-phase anaerobic bio-treatment systems. Bhattacharyya D, Singh KS. Water Sci Technol; 2008 Feb; 57(6):863-8. PubMed ID: 18413946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Sub-critical fouling in a membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment: experimental investigation and mathematical modelling. Guglielmi G, Saroj DP, Chiarani D, Andreottola G. Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3903-14. PubMed ID: 17604077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Pilot scale nanofiltration membrane separation for waste management in textile industry. Koyuncu I, Kural E, Topacik D. Water Sci Technol; 2001 Sep; 43(10):233-40. PubMed ID: 11436786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Herbal pharmaceutical wastewater treatment by a pilot scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Satyanarayan S, Karambe A, Vanerkar AP. Water Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 59(11):2265-72. PubMed ID: 19494467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Modelling of long-term simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SNDN) performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor. Sarioglu M, Insel G, Artan N, Orhon D. Water Sci Technol; 2008 Sep; 57(11):1825-33. PubMed ID: 18547937 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Anaerobic treatment performance and microbial population of thermophilic upflow anaerobic filter reactor treating awamori distillery wastewater. Tang YQ, Fujimura Y, Shigematsu T, Morimura S, Kida K. J Biosci Bioeng; 2007 Oct; 104(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 18023800 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Determination of kinetic constants of hybrid textile wastewater treatment system. Sandhya S, Sarayu K, Swaminathan K. Bioresour Technol; 2008 Sep; 99(13):5793-7. PubMed ID: 18023341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Surface water and wastewater treatment using a new tannin-based coagulant. Pilot plant trials. Sánchez-Martín J, Beltrán-Heredia J, Solera-Hernández C. J Environ Manage; 2010 Oct; 91(10):2051-8. PubMed ID: 20580152 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The effect of ozone on tannery wastewater biological treatment at demonstrative scale. Di Iaconi C, Ramadori R, Lopez A. Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(23):6121-4. PubMed ID: 19577926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Membrane bioreactors for winery wastewater treatment: case-studies at full scale. Guglielmi G, Andreottola G, Foladori P, Ziglio G. Water Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 60(5):1201-7. PubMed ID: 19717906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Performances of three R-AN-D-N wastewater treatment plants in the Czech Republic. Bejvl Z, Matuska P, Stara J, Chudoba P. Water Sci Technol; 2004 Dec; 50(7):249-55. PubMed ID: 15553483 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Application of mathematical tools to improve the design and operation of activated sludge plants. Case study: the new WWTP of Galindo-Bilbao. Part I: Optimum design. Rivas A, Ayesa E, Galarza A, Salterain A. Water Sci Technol; 2001 Dec; 43(7):157-65. PubMed ID: 11385842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in UCT-type MBR process. Lee H, Han J, Yun Z. Water Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 59(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19494447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. MARAPUR--a new process combination for the optimization of MBR. Klegraf F, Lahnsteiner J. Water Sci Technol; 2008 Dec; 58(11):2101-7. PubMed ID: 19092185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]