These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

204 related items for PubMed ID: 16241096

  • 1. Efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in detecting common bile duct lithiasis: our experience.
    Sperlongano P, Pisaniello D, Del Viscovo L, De Falco M, Parmeggiani D, Piatto A, Parmeggiani U.
    Chir Ital; 2005; 57(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 16241096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Comparative study of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in common duct stones].
    Miao L, Fan ZN, Ji GZ, Wen W, Wang X, Xiong GY, Jiang GB, Wang M, Liu Z, Wu P.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct 01; 46(19):1465-7. PubMed ID: 19094622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis.
    Guarise A, Baltieri S, Mainardi P, Faccioli N.
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar 01; 109(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 15775893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Do Benefits Outweigh the Costs?
    Ward WH, Fluke LM, Hoagland BD, Zarow GJ, Held JM, Ricca RL.
    Am Surg; 2015 Jul 01; 81(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26140894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for diagnosing stones in the common bile duct in patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiograms.
    Richard F, Boustany M, Britt LD.
    Am J Surg; 2013 Apr 01; 205(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 23518180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Better non-invasive endoscopic procedure: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
    Mesihović R, Mehmedović A.
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2019 Feb 01; 16(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 30256060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne H, Lee MJ.
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep 01; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: a prospective comparative study.
    Scaffidi MG, Luigiano C, Consolo P, Pellicano R, Giacobbe G, Gaeta M, Blandino A, Familiari L.
    Minerva Med; 2009 Oct 01; 100(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 19910887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ.
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan 01; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.
    Moon JH, Cho YD, Cha SW, Cheon YK, Ahn HC, Kim YS, Kim YS, Lee JS, Lee MS, Lee HK, Shim CS, Kim BS.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May 01; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging of the common bile duct to exclude choledocholithiasis.
    Kejriwal R, Liang J, Anderson G, Hill A.
    ANZ J Surg; 2004 Aug 01; 74(8):619-21. PubMed ID: 15315557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis.
    Hjartarson JH, Hannesson P, Sverrisson I, Blöndal S, Ívarsson B, Björnsson ES.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct 01; 51(10):1249-56. PubMed ID: 27181286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: when should we perform MRCP and ERCP?
    Cavdar F, Yildar M, Tellioğlu G, Kara M, Tilki M, Titiz Mİ.
    Pancreatology; 2014 Oct 01; 14(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 25200693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Laparoscopic Ultrasonography Versus Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Laparoscopic Surgery for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis and Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones.
    Luo Y, Yang T, Yu Q, Zhang Y.
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Jun 01; 23(6):1143-1147. PubMed ID: 30187333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.