These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

201 related items for PubMed ID: 1624625

  • 1. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Smith GM, Taylor WG.
    J Dent; 1992 Jun; 20(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 1624625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Smith GM, Taylor WG.
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A, Dixit S, Hoshing C, Raikar SP.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov 01; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Martinez LJ, von Fraunhofer JA.
    J Prosthodont; 1998 Jun 01; 7(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 9743664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S, Zaree Z, Mosharraf R.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep 01; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
    Wassell RW, Ibbetson RJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun 01; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
    Millstein P, Maya A, Segura C.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug 01; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S, Chowdhary R.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug 01; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Tjan AH, Nemetz H, Nguyen LT, Contino R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul 01; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy.
    Brosky ME, Pesun IJ, Lowder PD, Delong R, Hodges JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Feb 01; 87(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 11854678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
    Cox JR, Brandt RL, Hughes HJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May 01; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J, Palmer R, Howe L, Wilson R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar 01; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy.
    Gökçen-Rohlig B, Ongül D, Sancakli E, Sermet B.
    Implant Dent; 2014 Jun 01; 23(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 24844388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE, Johnson GH, Drennon DG.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan 01; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
    Garg S, Kumar S, Jain S, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Reddy NK.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug 01; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA, Vermilyea SG, Agar JR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec 01; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparative evaluation of tray spacer thickness and repeat pour on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinyl siloxane impression material: in vitro study.
    Kumar S, Yadav D, Yadav R, Arora A.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014 Dec 01; 25(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 24992848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.