These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

460 related items for PubMed ID: 16250571

  • 1. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
    Marder MZ, Marder RW.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K, Zandparsa R, Finkelman M, Hirayama H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Aug; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG, Mazaro JV, Vedovatto E, Assunção WG, dos Santos PH.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH.
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999 Jul; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005 Jul; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 May; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.