These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
139 related items for PubMed ID: 16250641
1. PostDOCK: a structural, empirical approach to scoring protein ligand complexes. Springer C, Adalsteinsson H, Young MM, Kegelmeyer PW, Roe DC. J Med Chem; 2005 Nov 03; 48(22):6821-31. PubMed ID: 16250641 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hierarchical PLS modeling for predicting the binding of a comprehensive set of structurally diverse protein-ligand complexes. Lindström A, Pettersson F, Almqvist F, Berglund A, Kihlberg J, Linusson A. J Chem Inf Model; 2006 Nov 03; 46(3):1154-67. PubMed ID: 16711735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. Muegge I, Martin YC. J Med Chem; 1999 Mar 11; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and evaluation of a generic evolutionary method for protein-ligand docking. Yang JM. J Comput Chem; 2004 Apr 30; 25(6):843-57. PubMed ID: 15011256 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. Friesner RA, Murphy RB, Repasky MP, Frye LL, Greenwood JR, Halgren TA, Sanschagrin PC, Mainz DT. J Med Chem; 2006 Oct 19; 49(21):6177-96. PubMed ID: 17034125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. Halgren TA, Murphy RB, Friesner RA, Beard HS, Frye LL, Pollard WT, Banks JL. J Med Chem; 2004 Mar 25; 47(7):1750-9. PubMed ID: 15027866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. Velec HF, Gohlke H, Klebe G. J Med Chem; 2005 Oct 06; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. Warren GL, Andrews CW, Capelli AM, Clarke B, LaLonde J, Lambert MH, Lindvall M, Nevins N, Semus SF, Senger S, Tedesco G, Wall ID, Woolven JM, Peishoff CE, Head MS. J Med Chem; 2006 Oct 05; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Generalized modeling of enzyme-ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures. Strömbergsson H, Kryshtafovych A, Prusis P, Fidelis K, Wikberg JE, Komorowski J, Hvidsten TR. Proteins; 2006 Nov 15; 65(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 16948162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. Jain AN. J Med Chem; 2003 Feb 13; 46(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 12570372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. GlamDock: development and validation of a new docking tool on several thousand protein-ligand complexes. Tietze S, Apostolakis J. J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Feb 13; 47(4):1657-72. PubMed ID: 17585857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data. Pearlman DA, Rao BG, Charifson P. Proteins; 2008 May 15; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]