These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
371 related items for PubMed ID: 16264121
1. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 87(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 16264121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty with 36 and 40-mm femoral heads. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():153-5. PubMed ID: 17006370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The rate of dislocation is not increased when minimal precautions are used after total hip arthroplasty using the posterolateral approach: a prospective, comparative safety study. Kornuijt A, Das D, Sijbesma T, van der Weegen W. Bone Joint J; 2016 May; 98-B(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 27143727 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 14711939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36 mm versus 28 mm femoral heads. Bistolfi A, Crova M, Rosso F, Titolo P, Ventura S, Massazza G. Hip Int; 2011 Jan; 21(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 21948039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J. Acta Orthop; 2012 Oct; 83(5):442-8. PubMed ID: 23039167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lower rates of dislocation with increased femoral head size after primary total hip replacement: a five-year analysis of NHS patients in England. Jameson SS, Lees D, James P, Serrano-Pedraza I, Partington PF, Muller SD, Meek RM, Reed MR. J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jul; 93(7):876-80. PubMed ID: 21705556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Femoral head size and surgical approach affect dislocation and overall revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: up to 9-year follow-up data of 269,280 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). van Steenbergen LN, de Reus IM, Hannink G, Vehmeijer SB, Schreurs BW, Zijlstra WP. Hip Int; 2023 Nov; 33(6):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 36935558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Oct; 84(10):1788-92. PubMed ID: 12377909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Instability After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Dual Mobility Versus Jumbo Femoral Heads. Beckert M, Meneghini RM, Meding JB. J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S571-S576. PubMed ID: 35271976 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Kelley SS, Lachiewicz PF, Hickman JM, Paterno SM. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):163-70. PubMed ID: 9917601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():19-23. PubMed ID: 16741469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]