These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

595 related items for PubMed ID: 16269107

  • 1. Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.
    Jacobsen T, Schröger E, Winkler I, Horváth J.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1704-13. PubMed ID: 16269107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Familiarity of environmental sounds is used to establish auditory rules.
    Kirmse U, Schröger E, Jacobsen T.
    Neuroreport; 2012 Mar 28; 23(5):320-4. PubMed ID: 22410549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Familiarity affects environmental sound processing outside the focus of attention: an event-related potential study.
    Kirmse U, Jacobsen T, Schröger E.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May 28; 120(5):887-96. PubMed ID: 19345610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Electrophysiological markers of voice familiarity.
    Beauchemin M, De Beaumont L, Vannasing P, Turcotte A, Arcand C, Belin P, Lassonde M.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jun 17; 23(11):3081-6. PubMed ID: 16819998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Implicit, intuitive, and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: an event-related brain potential study.
    van Zuijen TL, Simoens VL, Paavilainen P, Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug 17; 18(8):1292-303. PubMed ID: 16859415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
    Roye A, Jacobsen T, Schröger E.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug 17; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Visual processing affects the neural basis of auditory discrimination.
    Kislyuk DS, Möttönen R, Sams M.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec 17; 20(12):2175-84. PubMed ID: 18457500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects.
    Takegata R, Brattico E, Tervaniemi M, Varyagina O, Näätänen R, Winkler I.
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep 17; 25(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 15953710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N, Alho K, Korzyukov O, Carlson S, Martinkauppi S, Escera C, Rinne T, Aronen HJ, Näätänen R.
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul 17; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Temporal processing ability is related to ear-asymmetry for detecting time cues in sound: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J, Finch B, Smith E, Budd TW, Schall U.
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan 17; 49(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21040739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: An MEG study.
    Hsiao FJ, Wu ZA, Ho LT, Lin YY.
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Apr 17; 81(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19428969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Spatial location is accurately tracked by human auditory sensory memory: evidence from the mismatch negativity.
    Deouell LY, Parnes A, Pickard N, Knight RT.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Sep 17; 24(5):1488-94. PubMed ID: 16987229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Neuropsychological correlates of auditory perceptual inference: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J, Myers R, Pirillo R, Drysdale K.
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan 15; 1310():113-23. PubMed ID: 19914219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effects of interstimulus interval on sensory gating and on preattentive auditory memory in the oddball paradigm. Can magnitude of the sensory gating affect preattentive auditory comparison process?
    Ermutlu MN, Demiralp T, Karamürsel S.
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jan 22; 412(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17197084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Refractoriness, habituation, and mismatch effects in the auditory event-related potential to alternating stimuli.
    Yagcioglu S, Ungan P.
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan 08; 19(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18281891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of prosodic familiarity on the automatic processing of words in the human brain.
    Ylinen S, Strelnikov K, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep 08; 73(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 19482051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds.
    Müller D, Widmann A, Schröger E.
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Nov 08; 42(6):668-76. PubMed ID: 16364062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M, Kruck S, De Baene W, Schröger E, Alter K, Friederici AD.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct 08; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of spatial separation and stimulus probability on the event-related potentials elicited by occasional changes in sound location.
    Sonnadara RR, Alain C, Trainor LJ.
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb 03; 1071(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 16406012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.