These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
533 related items for PubMed ID: 16275306
1. In vitro wear resistance of three types of composite resin denture teeth. Zeng J, Sato Y, Ohkubo C, Hosoi T. J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 16275306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro wear assessment of titanium alloy teeth. Ohkubo C, Shimura I, Aoki T, Hanatani S, Hosoi T, Okabe T. J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 12501140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material. Hahnel S, Behr M, Handel G, Rosentritt M. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19328280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth. Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 19033028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Wear resistance of artificial denture teeth. Ghazal M, Steiner M, Kern M. Int J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 21(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 18546774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-body wear of resin denture teeth with and without nanofillers. Stober T, Henninger M, Schmitter M, Pritsch M, Rammelsberg P. J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 20141815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth. Ghazal M, Kern M. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-body wear of four types of light-activated composite resin veneering materials. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF. Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 7938432 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Wear of feldspathic ceramic, nano-filled composite resin and acrylic resin artificial teeth when opposed to different antagonists. Ghazal M, Hedderich J, Kern M. Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 19049531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel. Ghazal M, Yang B, Ludwig K, Kern M. Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 17688934 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Wear resistance of a modified polymethyl methacrylate artificial tooth compared to five commercially available artificial tooth materials. Kamonwanon P, Yodmongkol S, Chantarachindawong R, Thaweeboon S, Thaweeboon B, Srikhirin T. J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 25882971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite. Tagtekin DA, Yanikoglu FC, Bozkurt FO, Kologlu B, Sur H. Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 15081556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Compositional characteristics and hardness of acrylic and composite resin artificial teeth. Loyaga-Rendon PG, Takahashi H, Hayakawa I, Iwasaki N. J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 17692595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]