These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
233 related items for PubMed ID: 16275951
1. Evaluation of the PANBIO Brucella immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for diagnosis of human brucellosis. Araj GF, Kattar MM, Fattouh LG, Bajakian KO, Kobeissi SA. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1334-5. PubMed ID: 16275951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of the serological tests used for the laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis]. Ciftçi C, Oztürk F, Oztekin A, Karaoğlan H, Saba R, Gültekin M, Mamikoğlu L. Mikrobiyol Bul; 2005 Jul; 39(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 16358488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of the Chromotitre EIA test in the diagnosis of human brucellosis]. Colmenero JD, Porras J, Cárdenas A, Ocón P, Reguera JM, Delgado M, Sedeño J. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1994 Feb; 12(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 7516713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The value of the immunoglobulin G avidity test for the serologic diagnosis of brucellosis]. Kutlu SS, Celikbaş A, Ergönül O, Kutlu M, Aksaray S, Güvener E, Dokuzoğuz B. Mikrobiyol Bul; 2003 Oct; 37(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 14748263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance characteristics of the Euroimmun enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits for Brucella IgG and IgM. Prince HE, Lopez J, Yeh C, Tablante J, Morgan J, Kaneko B, Duffey P. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Oct; 65(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 19748418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of Brucella IgG and IgM ELISA assays with agglutination methodology. Welch RJ, Litwin CM. J Clin Lab Anal; 2010 Oct; 24(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 20486196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of an immunocapture-agglutination test and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test against cytosolic proteins from Brucella melitensis B115 in the diagnosis and follow-up of human acute brucellosis. Mantecón MA, Gutiérrez P, del Pilar Zarzosa M, Dueñas AI, Solera J, Fernández-Lago L, Vizcaíno N, Almaraz A, Bratos MA, Rodríguez Torres A, Orduña-Domingo A. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 May; 55(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 16500069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of Brucella ELISA IgG and IgM in bacteremic and non-bacteremic patients with brucellosis. Osoba AO, Balkhy H, Memish Z, Khan MY, Al-Thagafi A, Al Shareef B, Al Mowallad A, Oni GA. J Chemother; 2001 Apr; 13 Suppl 1():54-9. PubMed ID: 11434531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Brucella immunoglobulin M and G flow assays with serum agglutination and 2-mercaptoethanol tests in the diagnosis of brucellosis. Zeytinoğlu A, Turhan A, Altuğlu I, Bilgiç A, Abdoel TH, Smits HL. Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006 Apr; 44(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 16475904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of immuncapture agglutination and ELISA methods in serological diagnosis of brucellosis. Özdemir M, Feyzioğlu B, Kurtoğlu MG, Doğan M, Dağı HT, Yüksekkaya Ş, Keşli R, Baysal B. Int J Med Sci; 2011 Apr; 8(5):428-32. PubMed ID: 21814476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of brucellosis history on serological diagnosis and evolution of patients with acute brucellosis. Mantecón Mde L, Gutiérrez MP, Zarzosa Mdel P, Fernández-Lago L, Colmenero Jde D, Vizcaíno N, Bratos MA, Almaraz A, Cubero A, Muñoz MF, Rodríguez Torres A, Orduña A. J Infect; 2008 Nov; 57(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 18834635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Brucella Standard Agglutination Test with the ELISA IgG and IgM in patients with Brucella bacteremia. Memish ZA, Almuneef M, Mah MW, Qassem LA, Osoba AO. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2002 Oct; 44(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 12458117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of standard agglutination tests, enzyme immunoassay, and Coombs gel test used in laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis. Koçman EE, Erensoy MS, Taşbakan M, Çiçeklioğlu M. Turk J Med Sci; 2018 Feb 23; 48(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 29479956 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four commercial IgM and IgG ELISA kits for diagnosing brucellosis. Fadeel MA, Hoffmaster AR, Shi J, Pimentel G, Stoddard RA. J Med Microbiol; 2011 Dec 23; 60(Pt 12):1767-1773. PubMed ID: 21835974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against Brucella by dot-ELISA in humans. Barbuddhe SB, Yadava VK, Singh DK. J Commun Dis; 1994 Mar 23; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7963376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the Brucella IgM and IgG flow assays in the serodiagnosis of human brucellosis in an area endemic for brucellosis. Irmak H, Buzgan T, Evirgen O, Akdeniz H, Demiroz AP, Abdoel TH, Smits HL. Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2004 Jun 23; 70(6):688-94. PubMed ID: 15211015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Relationship between the duration of the clinical course of human brucellosis and the avidity of specific IgG antibodies]. Gutiérrez J, Rodríguez M, Maroto MC. Rev Med Chil; 1995 Jul 23; 123(7):819-22. PubMed ID: 8560111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of diagnostic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit and serological markers in human brucellosis. Cakan G, Bezirci FB, Kacka A, Cesur S, Aksaray S, Tezeren D, Saka D, Ahmed K. Jpn J Infect Dis; 2008 Sep 23; 61(5):366-70. PubMed ID: 18806343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of A newly developed DOT-ELISA kit for the diagnosis of human brucellosis. Batra HV, Agarwal GS, Rao PV. J Commun Dis; 2003 Jun 23; 35(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 15562951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]