These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
408 related items for PubMed ID: 16281341
1. Inverting the viability test for abortion law. Ching B. Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart. Borgmann CE. Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.". Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose. Swyers MH. Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997 Jun; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000. Arkes H. Hum Life Rev; 2000 Jun; 26(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 12530369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Must we really make the case for abortion rights all over again? Forde C. Conscience; 2005 Nov 30; 26(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 16639810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The argument that never ends. Simon R. US News World Rep; 2003 Jan 20; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The intimidation of American physicians--banning partial-birth abortion. Greene MF. N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2128-9. PubMed ID: 17452436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only? Bazzelle RY. Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998 May 24; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]