These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


188 related items for PubMed ID: 16287216

  • 1. ITT analysis of randomized encouragement design studies with missing data.
    Zhou XH, Li SM.
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug 30; 25(16):2737-61. PubMed ID: 16287216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Multiple imputation methods for treatment noncompliance and nonresponse in randomized clinical trials.
    Taylor L, Zhou XH.
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar 30; 65(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 18397338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An extended general location model for causal inferences from data subject to noncompliance and missing values.
    Peng Y, Little RJ, Raghunathan TE.
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep 30; 60(3):598-607. PubMed ID: 15339281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Likelihood methods for treatment noncompliance and subsequent nonresponse in randomized trials.
    O'Malley AJ, Normand SL.
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun 30; 61(2):325-34. PubMed ID: 16011678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Estimation and inference for the causal effect of receiving treatment on a multinomial outcome.
    Cheng J.
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar 30; 65(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 18373714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. On the design and analysis of randomized clinical trials with multiple endpoints.
    Tang DI, Geller NL, Pocock SJ.
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar 30; 49(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8513104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Model misspecification sensitivity analysis in estimating causal effects of interventions with non-compliance.
    Jo B.
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov 15; 21(21):3161-81. PubMed ID: 12375297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Discussion of "Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data".
    Small DS, Cheng J.
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep 15; 65(3):682-6; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 18759846
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Bayesian inference for randomized clinical trials with treatment failures.
    Shaffer ML, Chinchilli VM.
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr 30; 23(8):1215-28. PubMed ID: 15083479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data.
    Chen H, Geng Z, Zhou XH.
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep 30; 65(3):675-82. PubMed ID: 18759847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Pseudo-likelihood methods for longitudinal binary data with non-ignorable missing responses and covariates.
    Parzen M, Lipsitz SR, Fitzmaurice GM, Ibrahim JG, Troxel A.
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug 30; 25(16):2784-96. PubMed ID: 16345018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Simple adjustments for randomized trials with nonrandomly missing or censored outcomes arising from informative covariates.
    Baker SG, Fitzmaurice GM, Freedman LS, Kramer BS.
    Biostatistics; 2006 Jan 30; 7(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15923407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M, Donner A, Klar N.
    Biom J; 2008 Jun 30; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The intention-to-treat approach in randomized controlled trials: are authors saying what they do and doing what they say?
    Gravel J, Opatrny L, Shapiro S.
    Clin Trials; 2007 Jun 30; 4(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 17848496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Sample size determination for constrained longitudinal data analysis.
    Lu K, Mehrotra DV, Liu G.
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb 15; 28(4):679-99. PubMed ID: 19051207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Choosing the analysis population in non-inferiority studies: per protocol or intent-to-treat.
    Matilde Sanchez M, Chen X.
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr 15; 25(7):1169-81. PubMed ID: 16397861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Likelihood methods for regression models with expensive variables missing by design.
    Zhao Y, Lawless JF, McLeish DL.
    Biom J; 2009 Feb 15; 51(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 19197954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Efficient estimation for patient-specific rates of disease progression using nonnormal linear mixed models.
    Zhang P, Song PX, Qu A, Greene T.
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar 15; 64(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 17501938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.