These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


499 related items for PubMed ID: 16299603

  • 1. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
    Sensi LG, Marson FC, Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov 15; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Flowable composites as "filled adhesives:" a microleakage study.
    Sensi LG, Marson FC, Monteiro S, Baratieri LN, Caldeira de Andrada MA.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov 15; 5(4):32-41. PubMed ID: 15558088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC, Franke M, Maia HP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul 15; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of different softstart polymerization techniques on marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Muangmingsuk A, Senawongse P, Yudhasaraprasithi S.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr 15; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 12797570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F, Korkmaz Y, Başeren M.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov 01; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
    Demarco FF, Ramos OL, Mota CS, Formolo E, Justino LM.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Nov 01; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ, Stokes A, Moles DR.
    Oper Dent; 2005 Nov 01; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar 01; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC, Pimenta LA.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr 01; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H, Ghavamnasiri M, Manari V.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov 01; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N, Korkmaz Y.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb 01; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Microleakage of Class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study.
    St Georges AJ, Wilder AD, Perdigão J, Swift EJ.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug 01; 15(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 12572642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites.
    Civelek A, Ersoy M, L'Hotelier E, Soyman M, Say EC.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Aug 01; 28(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 14531612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct 01; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage.
    Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H, Tahvildarnejad N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb 01; 8(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 17277834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Crim GA, Chapman KW.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov 01; 25(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 7568683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE, Placido E, Francci CE, Perdigão J.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec 01; 12(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 10850249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS, Schlueter M, Roach T, Moss ME.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Dec 01; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb 15; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro.
    Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Feb 15; 27(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 12413221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.