These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
119 related items for PubMed ID: 16306840
1. Evaluation of cyanoacrylate augmentation of transpedicular screw pullout strength. Milcan A, Ayan I, Zeren A, Sinmazcelik T, Yilmaz A, Zeren M, Kuyurtar F. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Dec; 18(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 16306840 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength. Burval DJ, McLain RF, Milks R, Inceoglu S. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May 01; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of calcium sulfate paste for augmentation of lumbar pedicle screw pullout strength. Rohmiller MT, Schwalm D, Glattes RC, Elalayli TG, Spengler DM. Spine J; 2002 May 01; 2(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 14589476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of pedicle screws after kyphoplasty augmentation: an experimental study to compare transpedicular screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement. Linhardt O, Lüring C, Matussek J, Hamberger C, Plitz W, Grifka J. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr 01; 19(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 16760780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws. Zhuang XM, Yu BS, Zheng ZM, Zhang JF, Lu WW. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep 01; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Revision of the failed pedicle screw in osteoporotic lumbar spine: biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate augmentation. Derinçek A, Türker M, Cinar M, Cetik O, Kalaycioğlu B. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2012 Sep 01; 23(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 22765490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: an experimental study. Liu D, Zhang B, Xie QY, Kang X, Zhou JJ, Wang CR, Lei W, Zheng W. Spine J; 2016 Sep 01; 16(9):1124-32. PubMed ID: 27130374 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines. Becker S, Chavanne A, Spitaler R, Kropik K, Aigner N, Ogon M, Redl H. Eur Spine J; 2008 Nov 01; 17(11):1462-9. PubMed ID: 18781342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancing pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine using allograft bone plug interference fixation. Chrea B, Malempati H, Campbell JR, Khan S, Ching RP, Lee MJ. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 May 01; 27(3):E81-7. PubMed ID: 23563347 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone. Cook SD, Salkeld SL, Stanley T, Faciane A, Miller SD. Spine J; 2004 May 01; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Restoration of pull-out strength of the failed pedicle screw: biomechanical comparison of calcium sulfate vs polymethylmethacrylate augmentation. Güler UO, Derincek A, Hersekli MA, Ozalay M, Cinar BM, Acaroğlu E. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2014 May 01; 48(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 24747630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]