These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1103 related items for PubMed ID: 16318832

  • 1. The effect of contact lens wear on dynamic ocular surface temperature.
    Purslow C, Wolffsohn JS, Santodomingo-Rubido J.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2005 Mar; 28(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 16318832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology with 18 months silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16501408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Adverse events and discontinuations during 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):288-92. PubMed ID: 17993823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Conjunctival epithelial flaps with 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn J, Gilmartin B.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jan; 34(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 18180681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Long-term clinical results: 3 years of up to 30-night continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel and daily wear of low-Dk/t hydrogel lenses.
    Bergenske P, Long B, Dillehay S, Barr JT, Donshik P, Secor G, Yoakum J, Chalmers RL.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 17496699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear.
    Martin R, de Juan V, Rodriguez G, Martin S, Fonseca S.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17178252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparing goblet cell densities in patients wearing disposable hydrogel contact lenses versus silicone hydrogel contact lenses in an extended-wear modality.
    Lievens CW, Connor CG, Murphy H.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Oct; 29(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 14555901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Dumbleton K, Keir N, Moezzi A, Feng Y, Jones L, Fonn D.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of internal lubricating agents of disposable soft contact lenses on higher-order aberrations after blinking.
    Koh S, Maeda N, Hamano T, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Hori Y, Hosohata J, Fujikado T, Tano Y.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Mar; 34(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18327045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Tear film surface quality with soft contact lenses using dynamic-area high-speed videokeratoscopy.
    Alonso-Caneiro D, Iskander DR, Collins MJ.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 19657279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Influence of day and night wear on surface properties of silicone hydrogel contact lenses and bacterial adhesion.
    Vermeltfoort PB, Rustema-Abbing M, de Vries J, Bruinsma GM, Busscher HJ, van der Linden ML, Hooymans JM, van der Mei HC.
    Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 16783138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Corneal thickness change induced by dozing while wearing hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Hamano H, Maeda N, Hamano T, Mitsunaga S, Kotani S.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jan; 34(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 18180686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of nonpreserved care solutions on 12 months of daily and extended silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Robertson DM, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 18172068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of lens wear on refractive index of conventional hydrogel and silicone-hydrogel contact lenses: a comparative study.
    Lira M, Santos L, Azeredo J, Yebra-Pimentel E, Real Oliveira ME.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2008 Apr; 31(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 17964212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a).
    Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Dec; 32(6):281-6. PubMed ID: 17099389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Objective clinical performance of 'comfort-enhanced' daily disposable soft contact lenses.
    Wolffsohn JS, Hunt OA, Chowdhury A.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2010 Apr; 33(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 20149716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Changes in UV-visible transmittance of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses induced by wear.
    Lira M, Dos Santos Castanheira EM, Santos L, Azeredo J, Yebra-Pimentel E, Real Oliveira ME.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 86(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19289976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hydrogel lens comfort in challenging environments and the effect of refitting with silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Young G, Riley CM, Chalmers RL, Hunt C.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 84(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 17435513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A 12-month prospective clinical trial of comfilcon A silicone-hydrogel contact lenses worn on a 30-day continuous wear basis.
    Brennan NA, Coles ML, Connor HR, McIlroy RG.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 17420152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear.
    Dumbleton KA, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jul; 34(4):215-23. PubMed ID: 18787429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.