These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

336 related items for PubMed ID: 1632393

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Endocardial pacing, cardioversion and defibrillation using a braided endocardial lead system.
    Saksena S, Luceri R, Krol RB, Brownstein S, Burkhardt E, Accorti P, Brewer G, Scott S, Callaghan F, Livingston A.
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Apr 01; 71(10):834-41. PubMed ID: 8456763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks using a braided endocardial defibrillation lead system.
    Saksena S, Scott SE, Accorti PR, Boveja BK, Abels D, Callaghan FJ.
    Am Heart J; 1990 Dec 01; 120(6 Pt 1):1342-7. PubMed ID: 2248181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
    Saksena S, DeGroot P, Krol RB, Raju R, Mathew P, Mehra R.
    Circulation; 1993 Dec 01; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of polarity for monophasic and biphasic shocks on defibrillation efficacy with an endocardial system.
    Usui M, Walcott GP, Strickberger SA, Rollins DL, Smith WM, Ideker RE.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jan 01; 19(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 8848379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of monophasic and biphasic defibrillating pulse waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion. Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation Investigators.
    Greene HL, DiMarco JP, Kudenchuk PJ, Scheinman MM, Tang AS, Reiter MJ, Echt DS, Chapman PD, Jazayeri MR, Chapman FW.
    Am J Cardiol; 1995 Jun 01; 75(16):1135-9. PubMed ID: 7762500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.
    Thakur R, Souza JJ, Chapman PD, Troup PJ, Wetherbee JN.
    Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr 01; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical efficacy of dual electrode systems for endocardial cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia: a prospective randomized crossover trial.
    Saksena S, An H.
    Am Heart J; 1990 Jan 01; 119(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2404386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep.
    Cooper RA, Alferness CA, Smith WM, Ideker RE.
    Circulation; 1993 May 01; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
    Munsif AN, Saksena S, DeGroot P, Krol RB, Matthew P, Giorgberidze I, Kaushik RR, Mehra R.
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun 15; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic pulses: does the advantage of biphasic shocks depend on the waveshape?
    Natale A, Sra J, Krum D, Dhala A, Deshpande S, Jazayeri M, Axtell K, Degroot P, VanHout WL, Akhtar M.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul 15; 18(7):1354-61. PubMed ID: 7567587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical efficacy of shock waveforms and lead configurations for defibrillation.
    Jung W, Manz M, Moosdorf R, Spehl S, Wolpert C, Korte T, Lüderitz B.
    Am Heart J; 1994 Apr 15; 127(4 Pt 2):985-93. PubMed ID: 8160603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system.
    Thakur RK, Souza JJ, Chapman PD, Troup PJ, Wetherbee JN.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May 15; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements.
    Strickberger SA, Daoud E, Goyal R, Chan KK, Bogun F, Castellani M, Harvey M, Horwood LE, Niebauer M, Man KC, Morady F.
    Am Heart J; 1996 May 15; 131(5):961-5. PubMed ID: 8615317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Transthoracic Investigators.
    Bardy GH, Marchlinski FE, Sharma AD, Worley SJ, Luceri RM, Yee R, Halperin BD, Fellows CL, Ahern TS, Chilson DA, Packer DL, Wilber DJ, Mattioni TA, Reddy R, Kronmal RA, Lazzara R.
    Circulation; 1996 Nov 15; 94(10):2507-14. PubMed ID: 8921795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Transthoracic biphasic waveform defibrillation at very high and very low energies: a comparison with monophasic waveforms in an animal model of ventricular fibrillation.
    Clark CB, Zhang Y, Davies LR, Karlsson G, Kerber RE.
    Resuscitation; 2002 Aug 15; 54(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 12161298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks.
    Szili-Torok T, Theuns D, Verblaauw T, Scholten M, Kimman GJ, Res J, Jordaens L.
    Acta Cardiol; 2002 Oct 15; 57(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12405569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.