These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


358 related items for PubMed ID: 16329212

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS.
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD.
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
    Paul EW, Klassel D.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution.
    Hayhurst MB.
    Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The minor's limited right to confidential health care and the inverse of confidentiality: a parent's decision not to disclose illness status to a minor child.
    van Straaten J.
    Child Leg Rights J; 2000; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 16493796
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The undue burden: parental notification requirements for publicly funded contraception.
    Bornstein S.
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2000; 15():40-75. PubMed ID: 16518901
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM.
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS.
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Constitution and the anomaly of the pregnant teenager.
    Buchanan E.
    Ariz Law Rev; 1982; 24(3):553-610. PubMed ID: 11658425
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG, Dobson TA.
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W.
    Akron Law Rev; 1983 Dec; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M.
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002 Dec; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW.
    West VA Law Rev; 1983 Dec; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.