These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

342 related items for PubMed ID: 16330380

  • 21. Development of microscopic review criteria by comparison urine flow cytometer, strip and manual microscopic examination.
    Xiang D, Cong Y, Wang C, Yue J, Ma X, Lu Y, Liu P, Ma J.
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23163114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation the Clinitek status automated dipstick analysis device for semiquantitative testing of canine urine.
    Bauer N, Rettig S, Moritz A.
    Res Vet Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 18346768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Comparison of IRIS IQ ELITE and microscopy for urinalysis and evaluation of performance in predicting outcome of urine cultures].
    Ledru S, Canonne JP.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2008 Dec; 66(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 18957345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Use of a first-line urine protein-to-creatinine ratio strip test on random urines to rule out proteinuria in patients with chronic kidney disease.
    Guy M, Newall R, Borzomato J, Kalra PA, Price C.
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Apr; 24(4):1189-93. PubMed ID: 18987264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Semiquantitative, fully automated urine test strip analysis.
    Oyaert M, Delanghe JR.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 Jun; 33(5):e22870. PubMed ID: 30803042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Urinary specific gravity--comparative measurements using reagent strips and refractometer in 340 morning urine samples].
    Siegrist D, Hess B, Montandon M, Takkinen R, Lippuner K, Jaeger P.
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1993 Jan 26; 82(4):112-6. PubMed ID: 8434200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer and comparative study with JCCLS reference method.
    Sutheesophon K, Wiwanitkit V, Boonchalermvichian C, Charuruks N.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun 26; 85 Suppl 1():S246-52. PubMed ID: 12188419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Influence of commercial soft drinks or green tea intake to occult blood and sugar tests with urinalysis reagent strips].
    Matsuo C, Harashima N, Sekine K, Kanou M, Kanazawa M, Ishikawa K, Nara Y, Ikeda H.
    Rinsho Byori; 2009 Sep 26; 57(9):834-41. PubMed ID: 19860208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A comparison of diagnostic efficacies among different reagent strips and automated cell count in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
    Rerknimitr R, Limmathurotsakul D, Bhokaisawan N, Kongkam P, Treeprasertsuk S, Kullavanijaya P.
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 May 26; 25(5):946-50. PubMed ID: 20546448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.
    Lamchiagdhase P, Preechaborisutkul K, Lomsomboon P, Srisuchart P, Tantiniti P, Khan-u-Ra N, Preechaborisutkul B.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Aug 26; 358(1-2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16018883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The Ames Clinitek 200/Multistix 9 urinalysis method compared with manual and microscopic methods.
    Grinstead GF, Scott RE, Stevens BS, Ward VL, Wilson DM.
    Clin Chem; 1987 Sep 26; 33(9):1660-2. PubMed ID: 3621568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine sediment analyzer FUS200 in culture-positive urinary-tract infections.
    Kocer D, Sarıguzel FM, Karakukcu C.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2014 Aug 26; 74(5):414-7. PubMed ID: 24693995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A comparison of reagent strips and the refractometer for measurement of urine specific gravity in hospitalized children.
    Barton SJ, Holmes SS.
    Pediatr Nurs; 1998 Aug 26; 24(5):480-2. PubMed ID: 9832909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of urinary protein concentration and protein/creatinine ratio vs routine microscopy in urinalysis of dogs: 500 cases (1987-1988).
    Fettman MJ.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1989 Oct 01; 195(7):972-6. PubMed ID: 2793583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Urinalysis.
    Wilson LA.
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Oct 01; 19(35):51-4. PubMed ID: 15915958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Accuracy and influence of ascorbic acid on glucose-test with urine dip sticks in prenatal care.
    Ritterath C, Siegmund T, Rad NT, Stein U, Buhling KJ.
    J Perinat Med; 2006 Oct 01; 34(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 16856816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Accuracy of the spot urinary microalbumin:creatinine ratio and visual dipsticks in hypertensive pregnant women.
    Gangaram R, Naicker M, Moodley J.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jun 01; 144(2):146-8. PubMed ID: 19371998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Detection of postoperative pancreatitis after pancreatic surgery by urine trypsinogen strip test.
    Räty S, Sand J, Nordback I.
    Br J Surg; 2007 Jan 01; 94(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 17058314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Urinalysis: diagnostic role, usefulness of tests and inherent problems [proceedings].
    Young DS.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1978 Jan 01; 36(3):228-9. PubMed ID: 360890
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.