These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 16343806

  • 1. Acquisition versus steady state in the time-left experiment.
    Machado A, Vasconcelos M.
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb 28; 71(2-3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16343806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event.
    Aum S, Brown BL, Hemmes NS.
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb 22; 74(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 17157998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Context effect in a temporal bisection task with the choice keys available during the sample.
    Oliveira L, Machado A.
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun 22; 81(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 19162143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Time left: linear versus logarithmic subjective time.
    Gibbon J, Church RM.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr 22; 7(2):87-107. PubMed ID: 7241054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. When to respond? And how much? Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable components.
    Whitaker S, Lowe CF, Wearden JH.
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan 22; 77(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 17628349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Duration ratio discrimination in pigeons: a criterion-setting analysis.
    Fetterman JG.
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb 28; 71(2-3):330-5. PubMed ID: 16343807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Temporal generalization accounts for response resurgence in the peak procedure.
    Sanabria F, Killeen PR.
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb 22; 74(2):126-41. PubMed ID: 17141981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a successive temporal bisection task.
    Arantes J.
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun 22; 78(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 18280059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS.
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb 22; 74(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17079092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Discrimination of temporal relations by pigeons.
    Dreyfus LR, Fetterman JG, Smith LD, Stubbs DA.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Oct 22; 14(4):349-67. PubMed ID: 3183576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of training delays and start and stop markers on the choose-short effect in pigeons.
    Talarico DC, Grant DS.
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb 28; 71(2-3):98-106. PubMed ID: 16095850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prospective timing in pigeons: Isolating temporal perception in the time-left procedure.
    Vieira de Castro AC, Machado A.
    Behav Processes; 2010 May 28; 84(1):490-9. PubMed ID: 20176092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW, Christie-Fougere MM.
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov 01; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.