These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

470 related items for PubMed ID: 16351609

  • 1. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K, Abdullah BJ, Ng KH, Mahmud R, Hussain AF.
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, De Hauwere A, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Drescher P, Loose R, Georgi M.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
    Körner M, Wirth S, Treitl M, Reiser M, Pfeifer KJ.
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M, Reuter M, Palmié S, Harder E, Hutzelmann A, Heller M.
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP.
    Bildgebung; 1991 Feb; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A, Sjöström D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Feb; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
    Prato A, Ropolo R, Fava C.
    Radiol Med; 2005 Feb; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, Mertens BJ, Geleijns J.
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H, Sanada S, Doi K, Giger M, Xu XW, Yin FF, Montner SM, Carlin M.
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Photostimulation plates or conventional films for bedside chest x-ray in pediatric radiology? A comparative study of quality of image and the dose delivered to patients].
    Maccia C, Docou le Pointe H, Fery-Lemonnier E, Nadeau X, Montagne JP, Charpentier E, Ariche-Cohen M, Viens-Bitker C.
    J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1129-34. PubMed ID: 9033870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
    Roversi R, Castaldini L, Guidarelli G.
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A, Lawinski CP, Mackenzie A, Tabakov S, Lewis CA.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Dec; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT, Chan HP, Cascade PN, Chang CL, Chee PW, Mathews JF.
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH, Flynn MJ, Eyler WR, Samei E, Spizarny DL, Zylak CJ.
    Radiographics; 1998 Feb; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.