These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 16353530

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effects of resorbable membrane on human maxillary sinus graft: a pilot study.
    Choi KS, Kan JY, Boyne PJ, Goodacre CJ, Lozada JL, Rungcharassaeng K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 19344028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation.
    John HD, Wenz B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 15101590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.
    Cordaro L, Bosshardt DD, Palattella P, Rao W, Serino G, Chiapasco M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting.
    Froum SJ, Wallace SS, Elian N, Cho SC, Tarnow DP.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 17243327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bone quality at the implant site after reconstruction of a local defect of the maxillary anterior ridge with chin bone or deproteinised cancellous bovine bone.
    Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM, Schüpbach P, Meijer HJ, Vissink A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 34(8):877-84. PubMed ID: 15978776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute.
    Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003 Dec; 18(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12608669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone vs. a bovine-derived xenograft - a 5-year retrospective study.
    Lutz R, Berger-Fink S, Stockmann P, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 25906198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement.
    Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim SG, Kim BS, Ong JL.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e21-8. PubMed ID: 19138634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration.
    Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Schärer P.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997 Feb; 12(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 9425767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Maxillary sinus floor elevation for implant placement with demineralized freeze-dried bone and bovine bone (Bio-Oss): a clinical study of 20 patients.
    Valentini P, Abensur D.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Jun; 17(3):232-41. PubMed ID: 9497715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.