These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1040 related items for PubMed ID: 16356322

  • 1. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH, Vogel RO, Postma A.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.
    van der Lubbe RH, Havik MM, Bekker EM, Postma A.
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 16712585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process?
    Handy TC, Khoe W.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1936-49. PubMed ID: 16356330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
    Chica AB, Lupiáñez J.
    Brain Res; 2009 Jun 30; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Lateralized ERP components related to spatial orienting: discriminating the direction of attention from processing sensory aspects of the cue.
    Jongen EM, Smulders FT, Van der Heiden JS.
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Nov 30; 44(6):968-86. PubMed ID: 17617171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M, Postma A, De Haan E.
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb 30; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reaction time inhibition from subliminal cues: is it related to inhibition of return?
    Mele S, Savazzi S, Marzi CA, Berlucchi G.
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb 12; 46(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 18206184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
    Talsma D, Mulckhuyse M, Slagter HA, Theeuwes J.
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct 31; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing.
    Obhi SS, Goodale MA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep 31; 94(3):1861-8. PubMed ID: 15917318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E, Poliakoff E, Brown RJ.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun 31; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effects of action video game experience on the time course of inhibition of return and the efficiency of visual search.
    Castel AD, Pratt J, Drummond E.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Jun 31; 119(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 15877981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Orienting of spatial attention in Huntington's Disease.
    Couette M, Bachoud-Levi AC, Brugieres P, Sieroff E, Bartolomeo P.
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr 31; 46(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 18242648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ, Green JJ.
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug 28; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return.
    Prime DJ, Ward LM.
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb 09; 1072(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 16445889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
    Tian Y, Klein RM, Satel J, Xu P, Yao D.
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun 09; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cueing method biases in visual detection studies.
    Jaffard M, Benraiss A, Longcamp M, Velay JL, Boulinguez P.
    Brain Res; 2007 Nov 07; 1179():106-18. PubMed ID: 17894934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM.
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar 07; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Uncued and cued dynamics measured by response classification.
    Shimozaki SS.
    J Vis; 2010 Jul 01; 10(8):10. PubMed ID: 20884585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J, Ritter W, Gomes H.
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jul 01; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Revealing effects of noninformative spatial cues: an EEG study of inhibition of return.
    Wascher E, Tipper SP.
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Sep 01; 41(5):716-28. PubMed ID: 15318878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 52.