These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

196 related items for PubMed ID: 1635737

  • 1. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G, Schlaerth JB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A, De Marchi WG, Bell V, Nishikawa R.
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb 01; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG, Sadeghi M, Fotheringham N, Semrad N, Watring WG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov 01; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T, Knight AL, Elswick RK.
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug 01; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Aug 01; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr 01; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B, Gearhart J, Evers CG, Cason Z, Replogle WH.
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar 01; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
    Germain M, Heaton R, Erickson D, Henry M, Nash J, O'Connor D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug 01; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
    Smith-Levitin M, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P.
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct 01; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
    Lai-Goldman M, Nieberg RK, Mulcahy D, Wiesmeier E.
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct 01; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Oct 01; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM, Blythe JG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct 01; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD, Hernandez E, Dunton CJ.
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr 01; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Efficacy of cotton-tipped applicators for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix for Papanicolaou smears.
    Shen JT, Nalick RH, Schlaerth JB, Morrow CP.
    Acta Cytol; 1984 Apr 01; 28(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 6592916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
    Tyau L, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P, Edmonds P.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov 01; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Improved endocervical cell yield with Cytobrush.
    Deckert JJ, Staten SF, Palermo V.
    J Fam Pract; 1988 Jun 01; 26(6):639-41. PubMed ID: 3379366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
    Trimbos JB, Arentz NP.
    Acta Cytol; 1986 Jun 01; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
    Noel ML.
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989 Jun 01; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.
    Kavak ZN, Eren F, Pekin S, Küllü S.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Nov 01; 35(4):446-9. PubMed ID: 8717577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.