These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

196 related items for PubMed ID: 1635737

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM, Javaheri G.
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
    Rivlin ME, Woodliff JM, Bowlin RB, Moore JL, Martin RW, Grossman JH, Morrison JC.
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M, Fertitta L, Goldbaum B, Hamza M, Vanerian S, Isenstein L.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G, Graham L, Cannon D, Waters K, Feller D.
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
    Hoffman MS, Gordy LW, Cavanagh D.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Nov; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Nov; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The efficacy of an endocervical brush in obtaining adequate Papanicolaou smears.
    Grossman MB, Clofine R.
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 Sep; 91(9):875-9. PubMed ID: 1757278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparison of cytobrush with cotton swab for endocervical cytologic sampling.
    Neinstein LS, Rabinovitz S, Recalde A.
    J Adolesc Health Care; 1989 Jul; 10(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 2732111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F, Boon ME, Beck S, Knottnerus JA, Essed GG.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Jul; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Spatula/cytobrush vs. spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions.
    Selvaggi SM.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 2810246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE.
    Acta Cytol; 1986 Sep; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Sampling devices for the Papanicolaou test].
    Broso P, Buffetti G, Sacco A.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Sep; 44(9):441-7. PubMed ID: 1436619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.
    McCord ML, Stovall TG, Meric JL, Summitt RL, Coleman SA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. PubMed ID: 1615986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.