These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

448 related items for PubMed ID: 16358193

  • 1. [How does a cochlear implant speech processor work?].
    Adunka O, Kiefer J.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Nov; 84(11):841-50; quiz 851-4. PubMed ID: 16358193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM.
    Nature; 1991 Jul 18; 352(6332):236-8. PubMed ID: 1857418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug 18; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct 18; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Examination to possibilities of a physiological fitting of cochlear implants].
    Braunschweig T, Schelhorn-Neise P, Biedermann F, Weisser P.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Jun 18; 83(6):387-90. PubMed ID: 15197679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Vienna cochlear implant program.
    Burian K, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Eisenwort B.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May 18; 19(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 3754952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Design and function: a physical and electrical description of the 3M House cochlear implant system.
    Fretz RJ, Fravel RP.
    Ear Hear; 1985 May 18; 6(3 Suppl):14S-19S. PubMed ID: 3839470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.
    Lan N, Nie KB, Gao SK, Zeng FG.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May 18; 51(5):752-60. PubMed ID: 15132501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Computer-assisted rehabilitation of auditory perception after cochlear implants and hearing aid management].
    Gross M, Herrmann HW.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar 18; 73(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 8172634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [History of the development and functional description of the Nucleus cochlear implant].
    Maltan AA.
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1994 Mar 18; 144(1-2):29-33. PubMed ID: 8197760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [No Hearing Sensation after cochlear implantation despite successful objective measurement outcome].
    Gärtner L, Büchner A, Joseph G, Neuburger J, Lenarz T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Apr 18; 90(4):224-5. PubMed ID: 21181621
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor.
    Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Zerbi M, van den Honert C, Finley CC, Farmer JC, McElveen JT, Roush PA.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov 18; 19(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 9831150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG, Liu S.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr 18; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The cochlear prosthesis: a review of the design and evaluation of electrode implants for the profoundly deaf.
    Spelman FA.
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1982 Apr 18; 8(3):223-52. PubMed ID: 6754255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with cochlear implants: a review].
    Gstoettner W, Adunka O, Hamzavi J, Baumgartner WD.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun 02; 112(11):464-72. PubMed ID: 10890122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The cochlear implant; basic principles.
    Brackmann DE.
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Mar 02; 86(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 1256212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for normal-hearing listeners and patients with cochlear implants.
    Dorman MF, Loizou PC.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov 02; 18(6 Suppl):S113-4. PubMed ID: 9391623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Hildesheimer M, Muchnik C.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun 02; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Electrophonic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Risberg A, Agelfors E, Lindström B, Bredberg G.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jun 02; 469():156-63. PubMed ID: 2356722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.