These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 1636632

  • 1. Mandibular growth estimated by four cephalometric measurements.
    Hägg U, Attström K.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Aug; 102(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 1636632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cephalometric evaluation of condylar and mandibular growth modification: a review.
    Shen G, Darendeliler MA.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 16420269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Identification of the cephalometric reference point condylion on lateral head films.
    Forsberg CM, Odenrick L.
    Angle Orthod; 1989 Feb; 59(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 2729665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS, Cohen G, Ghafari J.
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Facial growth in males 16 to 20 years of age.
    Love RJ, Murray JM, Mamandras AH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Mar; 97(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 2309666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mandibular remodeling measured on cephalograms. 1. Osseous changes relative to superimposition on metallic implants.
    Baumrind S, Ben-Bassat Y, Korn EL, Bravo LA, Curry S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Aug; 102(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 1636630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB, Buschang PH, Alexander RG, Boley JC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Analysis of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth.
    Chen JY, Will LA, Niederman R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 12439474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mandibular growth in subjects with infraoccluded deciduous molars: a superimposition study.
    Leonardi M, Armi P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Caltabiano M.
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):927-34. PubMed ID: 16448233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth.
    Aki T, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Nanda SK.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jul; 106(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 8017351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mandibular remodeling measured on cephalograms: 2. A comparison of information from implant and anatomic best-fit superimpositions.
    Baumrind S, Ben-Bassat Y, Korn EL, Bravo LA, Curry S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Sep; 102(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 1510047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
    Arat ZM, Rübendüz M, Akgül AA.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Measurements of mandibular length: a comparison of articulare vs condylion.
    Haas DW, Martinez DF, Eckert GJ, Diers NR.
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 11407774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Can 'articulare' be used in the cephalometric analysis of mandibular length? A methodologic study.
    Stickel A, Pancherz H.
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 10(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 3208849
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.
    Ongkosuwito EM, Dieleman MM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Mulder PG, van Neck JW.
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 19254052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Displacement of the glenoid fossa: a cephalometric evaluation of growth during treatment.
    Agronin KJ, Kokich VG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Jan; 91(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 3467579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of extraoral lateral force loading on the mandible in the mandibular development of growing rats.
    Ishii T, Yamaguchi H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):782-91. PubMed ID: 19061805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Relationship between the direction of mandibular growth and masseter muscle conduction velocity.
    Konno M, Sato K, Mito T, Mitani H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):35-43; discussion 43-4. PubMed ID: 16027623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Aras A, Ada E, Saracoğlu H, Gezer NS, Aras I.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 22051481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Technical note: Age estimation from mandible by lateral cephalogram: a preliminary study.
    Rai B, Krishan K, Kaur J, Anand SC.
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2008 Jun 01; 26(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 22689354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.