These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


198 related items for PubMed ID: 16373760

  • 1. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality.
    Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, Eichler K, Hammerstingl R, Dogan S, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ.
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 16373760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
    Francone M, Napoli A, Carbone I, Cavacece M, Nardis PG, Lanciotti K, Visconti S, Bertoletti L, Di Castro E, Catalano C, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Influence of heart rate and cardiac phases on image quality using 320-detector row CT].
    Sun G, Li M, Li GY, Ding J, Li SH.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jan 04; 91(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21418953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of heart rate on image quality to identify the best cardiac phase in 16-slice coronary CT angiography.
    Mayurasakorn S, Siriapisith T, Wasinrat J.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jul 04; 91(7):1076-81. PubMed ID: 18839848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality.
    Hong C, Becker CR, Huber A, Schoepf UJ, Ohnesorge B, Knez A, Brüning R, Reiser MF.
    Radiology; 2001 Sep 04; 220(3):712-7. PubMed ID: 11526271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessment of image quality of 64-row Dual Source versus Single Source CT coronary angiography on heart rate: a phantom study.
    Dikkers R, Greuter MJ, Kristanto W, van Ooijen PM, Sijens PE, Willems TP, Oudkerk M.
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr 04; 70(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 18308496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of the optimal image reconstruction interval for coronary artery imaging using 64-slice computed tomography.
    Weininger M, Ritter C, Beer M, Hahn D, Beissert M.
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Jul 04; 48(6):620-7. PubMed ID: 17611868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Coronal reformations of the chest on 64-row multi-detector row CT: evaluation of image quality in comparison with 16-, 8- and 4-row multi-detector row CT.
    Nishino M, Kubo T, Kataoka ML, Raptopoulos V, Hatabu H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug 04; 59(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 16567075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mono- versus bisegment reconstruction algorithms for dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, Leschka SC, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Flohr TG, Marincek B, Wildermuth S.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Oct 04; 43(10):703-11. PubMed ID: 18791412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate.
    Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, Schmid FT, De Vries L, Grass M, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ.
    Radiology; 2005 Jan 04; 234(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 15550373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of reconstruction intervals in routine ECG-pulsed 64-row-MSCT coronary angiography in frequency controlled patients.
    Frydrychowicz A, Pache G, Saueressig U, Föll D, Kotter E, Langer M, Bley TA.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007 Jan 04; 30(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 17086457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality.
    Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, Koepfli P, Schepis T, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, Alkadhi H.
    Radiology; 2006 Nov 04; 241(2):378-85. PubMed ID: 16966483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging.
    Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S, Toyoda H, Nishina T, Ohba M, Hosokawa R, Kimura T, Tamaki N, Komeda M, Kita T, Konishi J.
    Radiology; 2005 Feb 04; 234(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 15670995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy?
    Herzog C, Nguyen SA, Savino G, Zwerner PL, Doll J, Nielsen CD, Flohr TG, Vogl TJ, Costello P, Schoepf UJ.
    Radiology; 2007 Jul 04; 244(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 17495177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Coronary artery bypass grafts: ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography--influence of image reconstruction interval on graft visibility.
    Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Kobza R, Verdun FR, Seifert B, Marincek B, Boehm T.
    Radiology; 2004 Aug 04; 232(2):568-77. PubMed ID: 15215552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. 64-MDCT coronary angiography of patients with atrial fibrillation: influence of heart rate on image quality and efficacy in evaluation of coronary artery disease.
    Yang L, Zhang Z, Fan Z, Xu C, Zhao L, Yu W, Yan Z.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep 04; 193(3):795-801. PubMed ID: 19696294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography.
    Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, Nielsen CD, Nguyen SA, Savino G, Vogl TJ, Costello P, Schoepf UJ.
    Radiology; 2007 Jul 04; 244(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 17581898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.