These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
365 related items for PubMed ID: 16375258
1. Characterization of gene therapy products and the impact of manufacturing changes on product comparability. Simek SL. Dev Biol (Basel); 2005; 122():139-44. PubMed ID: 16375258 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterizing biological products and assessing comparability following manufacturing changes. Chirino AJ, Mire-Sluis A. Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Nov; 22(11):1383-91. PubMed ID: 15529163 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Process and product development in the manufacturing of molecular therapeutics. Atkinson EM, Christensen JR. Curr Opin Mol Ther; 1999 Aug; 1(4):422-9. PubMed ID: 11713755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulatory philosophy for comparability protocols. Moos M. Dev Biol (Basel); 2002 Aug; 109():53-6. PubMed ID: 12434913 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biological products: reporting of biological product deviations in manufacturing. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Final rule. Fed Regist; 2000 Nov 07; 65(216):66621-35. PubMed ID: 11503696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Product development of probiotics as biological drugs. Sutton A. Clin Infect Dis; 2008 Feb 01; 46 Suppl 2():S128-32; discussion S144-51. PubMed ID: 18181718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulatory perspectives from Japan - comparability of biopharmaceuticals. Kawanishi T. Biologicals; 2006 Mar 01; 34(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 16330220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Microarray-based gene expression analysis as a process characterization tool to establish comparability of complex biological products: scale-up of a whole-cell immunotherapy product. Wang M, Senger RS, Paredes C, Banik GG, Lin A, Papoutsakis ET. Biotechnol Bioeng; 2009 Nov 01; 104(4):796-808. PubMed ID: 19591186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Preparing for an FDA preapproval inspection. Blackmer RA. Qual Assur; 1994 Dec 01; 3(4):389-403. PubMed ID: 7613749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Supplements and other changes to an approved application. Final rule. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Fed Regist; 2004 Apr 08; 69(68):18727-67. PubMed ID: 15072041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recommendations regarding technical standards for follow-on biologics: comparability, similarity, interchangeability. Davis GC, Beals JM, Johnson C, Mayer MH, Meiklejohn BI, Mitlak BH, Roth JL, Towns JK, Veenhuizen M. Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jul 08; 25(7):1655-61. PubMed ID: 19476407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The challenge of follow-on biologics for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Reingold SC, Steiner JP, Polman CH, Cohen JA, Freedman MS, Kappos L, Thompson AJ, Wolinsky JS. Neurology; 2009 Aug 18; 73(7):552-9. PubMed ID: 19687456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and approval of vaccines in the United States. Botstein P. Isr J Med Sci; 1986 Aug 18; 22(3-4):268-71. PubMed ID: 3528047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]