These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

613 related items for PubMed ID: 16378639

  • 1. Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors.
    Alió JL, Montés-Mico R.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16378639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
    Montés-Micó R, Rodríguez-Galietero A, Alió JL.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations.
    Kohnen T, Bühren J, Kühne C, Mirshahi A.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Dec; 111(12):2175-85. PubMed ID: 15582071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Retreatment after wavefront-guided and standard myopic LASIK.
    Jin GJ, Merkley KH.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1623-8. PubMed ID: 16828506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Correction and induction of high-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided LASIK and their influence on the postoperative contrast sensitivity].
    Hammer T, Heynemann M, Naumann I, Duncker GI.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Mar; 223(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 16552654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison.
    Moshirfar M, Schliesser JA, Chang JC, Oberg TJ, Mifflin MD, Townley R, Livingston MK, Kurz CJ.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1336-43. PubMed ID: 20656157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Surface ablation after laser in situ keratomileusis: retreatment on the flap.
    Beerthuizen JJ, Siebelt E.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1376-80. PubMed ID: 17662427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z, Garufis C, Duh YJ, Soltes CR, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Wavefront- and topography-guided ablation in myopic eyes using Zyoptix.
    Kanjani N, Jacob S, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Agarwal S, Agarwal T, Doshi A, Doshi S.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):398-402. PubMed ID: 15030830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration.
    Zhang J, Zhou YH, Wang NL, Li R.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Jan 20; 121(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 18272040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the treatment of high myopia by using the CustomVue wavefront platform.
    Kulkamthorn T, Silao JN, Torres LF, Lim JN, Purcell TL, Tantayakom T, Schanzlin DJ.
    Cornea; 2008 Aug 20; 27(7):787-90. PubMed ID: 18650664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. CustomCornea wavefront retreatment after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Schwartz GS, Park DH, Lane SS.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug 20; 31(8):1502-5. PubMed ID: 16129283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.
    Padmanabhan P, Mrochen M, Basuthkar S, Viswanathan D, Joseph R.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar 20; 34(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18299062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Relationship between preoperative aberrations and postoperative refractive error in enhancement of previous laser in situ keratomileusis with the LADARVision system.
    Steinert RF, Fynn-Thompson N.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Aug 20; 34(8):1267-72. PubMed ID: 18655975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Chung SH, Lee IS, Lee YG, Lee HK, Kim EK, Yoon G, Seo KY.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May 20; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform.
    Kirwan C, O'Keefe M.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan 20; 147(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18775529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Wavefront-guided retreatment after primary wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in myopes and hyperopes: long-term follow-up.
    Kashani S, Rajan M, Gartry D.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar 20; 147(3):417-423.e2. PubMed ID: 19054497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Pérez-Santonja JJ, Ayala MJ, Sakla HF, Ruíz-Moreno JM, Alió JL.
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Jan 20; 106(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 9917776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
    Kalyvianaki MI, Kymionis GD, Kounis GA, Panagopoulou SI, Grentzelos MA, Pallikaris IG.
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec 20; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Wavefront-guided ablation retreatment using Iris registration.
    Mohamed EM, Muftuoglu O, Bowman W, Cavanagh HD, Mootha VV, Radwan GA, McCulley JP.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2010 Jan 20; 36(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 20009941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.