These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

116 related items for PubMed ID: 16395244

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems (initial experiences and physical evaluation).
    Gomi T, Koshida K, Miyati T, Miyagawa J, Hirano H.
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Dec; 19(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 16763929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
    Matsumoto M, Sumida I, Ideguchi T, Kawaji Y, Himuro K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Dec; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
    Samei E.
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Comparison of basic imaging properties for digital radiographic systems based on a direct conversion type of flat panel detector].
    Sakai S, Katayama R, Morishita J, Sakaguchi T, Ohkubo S, Maeda T, Hayabuchi N.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jan 20; 64(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18311020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
    Murai M, Kishimoto K, Tanaka K, Oota K, Ienaga A.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov 20; 66(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 21099174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
    Yokoi T, Takata T, Ichikawa K.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011 Nov 20; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.
    Saunders RS, Samei E, Jesneck JL, Lo JY.
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb 20; 32(2):588-99. PubMed ID: 15789606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.
    Samei E, Flynn MJ, Reimann DA.
    Med Phys; 1998 Jan 20; 25(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 9472832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK, Vandenbroucke D, Struye L, Maidment AD, Kao YH, Albert M, Bosmans H, Marchal G.
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun 20; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.
    Samei E, Ranger NT, Dobbins JT, Chen Y.
    Med Phys; 2006 May 20; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Application of a variable filter for presampled modulation transfer function analysis with the edge method.
    Higashide R, Ichikawa K, Kunitomo H, Ohashi K.
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2015 Jul 20; 8(2):320-30. PubMed ID: 26088943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.