These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

614 related items for PubMed ID: 16408184

  • 1. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S, Glezerman M, Baider C, Sadan O.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M.
    West Afr J Med; 1991 Apr; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C, Beucher G, Dupuis O, Feraud O, Simon-Toulza C, Sentilhes L, Meunier E, Parant O, Schmitz T, Riethmuller D, Baud O, Galley-Raulin F, Diemunsch P, Pierre F, Schaal JP, Fournié A, Oury JF, French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS, Premaratne S.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V, Vadalkar J, Cely S, Dopwell F, Yoong W.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008 Jul; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984.
    Broekhuizen FF, Washington JM, Johnson F, Hamilton PR.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):338-42. PubMed ID: 3822282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH, Figueroa R, Garry D, Elimian A, Maulik D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, Hitti J, Critchlow C.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Instrumental rotational delivery in primiparae.
    Gleeson NC, Gormally SM, Morrison JJ, O'Regan M.
    Ir Med J; 1992 Dec; 85(4):139-41. PubMed ID: 1473948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M, Ahinko-Hakamaa K, Laakkonen E, Kivelä P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.
    de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW.
    BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17999693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria.
    Adaji SE, Shittu SO, Sule ST.
    Ann Afr Med; 2009 Jan; 8(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 19805939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
    Williams MC, Knuppel RA, O'Brien WF, Weiss A, Kanarek KS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Mesleh RA, Al-Sawadi HM, Kurdi AM.
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [About the choice of extraction instrument for vaginal operative termination in vertex presentation (author's transl)].
    Altmann P, Georgiades E, Reinold E, Wagenbichler P.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Dec; 35(12):949-55. PubMed ID: 1213260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD, Ramamurthy RS, O'Connor PS, Brown K, Hayashi RH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Indications and technic of operative vaginal delivery in vertex presentation].
    Gitsch E, Reinold E.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984 Oct; 106(10):653-9. PubMed ID: 6485615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD, Ramamurthy RS, O'Connor PS, Brown KJ, Hayashi RH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery.
    Youssef R, Ramalingam U, Macleod M, Murphy DJ.
    BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):941-5. PubMed ID: 15957996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.
    Benedetto C, Marozio L, Prandi G, Roccia A, Blefari S, Fabris C.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17126475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.