These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

166 related items for PubMed ID: 16421748

  • 1. Differences in aerodynamic characteristics of new and dysfunctional Provox 2 voice prostheses in vivo.
    Schwandt LQ, Tjong-Ayong HJ, van Weissenbruch R, der Mei HC, Albers FW.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 263(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 16421748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Lactobacilli: important in biofilm formation on voice prostheses.
    Buijssen KJ, Harmsen HJ, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, van der Laan BF.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Sep; 137(3):505-7. PubMed ID: 17765785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Degradation of silicone rubber causes Provox 2 voice prosthesis malfunctioning.
    Fusconi M, Taddei AR, Gallo A, Conte M, De Virgilio A, Greco A, Lo Vasco VR, Macrì GF, Roma R, Volpini F, Benincasa AT, De Vincentiis M.
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 24315657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox tracheosophageal voice prostheses.
    Chung RP, Patel P, Ter Keurs M, Van Lith Bijl JT, Mahieu HF.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998 Mar; 119(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 10089797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biofilm formation and design features of indwelling silicone rubber tracheoesophageal voice prostheses--an electron microscopical study.
    Leunisse C, van Weissenbruch R, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Dijk F, Albers FW.
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 Mar; 58(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 11505431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In vitro biofilm growth on modern voice prostheses.
    Leonhard M, Zatorska B, Tan Y, Moser D, Schneider-Stickler B.
    Head Neck; 2018 Apr; 40(4):763-769. PubMed ID: 29286184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Air-flow resistances of silicone rubber voice prostheses after formation of bacterial and fungal biofilms.
    Elving GJ, van Der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, van Weissenbruch R, Albers FW.
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 Apr; 58(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 11410901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In vitro leakage susceptibility of tracheoesophageal shunt prostheses in the absence and presence of a biofilm.
    Oosterhof JJ, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Free RH, Kaper HJ, van Weissenbruch R, Albers FW.
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Apr; 73(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15660395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the microbial composition of voice prosthesis biofilms from patients requiring frequent versus infrequent replacement.
    Elving GJ, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, van Weissenbruch R, Albers FW.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2002 Mar; 111(3 Pt 1):200-3. PubMed ID: 11915880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of surface roughness on silicone rubber voice prostheses on in vitro biofilm formation and clinical lifetime in laryngectomised patients.
    Buijssen KJDA, Oosterhof JJH, Basil L, Waters M, Duits MA, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, van der Laan BFAM.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 42(6):1235-1240. PubMed ID: 28236355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of buttermilk consumption on biofilm formation on silicone rubber voice prostheses in an artificial throat.
    Busscher HJ, Bruinsma G, van Weissenbruch R, Leunisse C, van der Mei HC, Dijk F, Albers FW.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1998 Dec; 255(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 9801860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biofilm in voice prosthesis: A prospective cohort study and laboratory tests using sonication and SEM analysis.
    Galli J, Calo L, Meucci D, Giuliani M, Lucidi D, Paludetti G, Torelli R, Sanguinetti M, Parrilla C.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 43(5):1260-1265. PubMed ID: 29768730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vivo aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis.
    Van den Hoogen FJ, Veenstra A, Verkerke GJ, Schutte HK, Manni JJ.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Nov; 117(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 9442834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of different combinations of bacteria and yeasts in voice prosthesis biofilms on air flow resistance.
    Elving GJ, van der Mei H, Busscher H, van Weissenbruch R, Albers F.
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2003 Nov; 83(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 12755479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Aerodynamic characteristics of the Provox low-resistance indwelling voice prosthesis.
    Hilgers FJ, Cornelissen MW, Balm AJ.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1993 Nov; 250(7):375-8. PubMed ID: 8286099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of biofilm formation on new Phonax and Provox 2 voice prostheses - a pilot study.
    Leonhard M, Moser D, Reumueller A, Mancusi G, Bigenzahn W, Schneider-Stickler B.
    Head Neck; 2010 Jul; 32(7):886-95. PubMed ID: 19862824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Candida biofilm formation on voice prostheses.
    Talpaert MJ, Balfour A, Stevens S, Baker M, Muhlschlegel FA, Gourlay CW.
    J Med Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 64(Pt 3):199-208. PubMed ID: 25106862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.